Análises para Double-click Image Downloader
Double-click Image Downloader por Marnes
13 análises
Resposta do programador
publicado a há um anoAs mentioned many times before (I should add this to the FAQ part), it depends on the website, this observation is not global. Many servers provide filename extensions one way or another, but e.g. twitter doesn't in any way (because websites don't need to) and my addon can't just take a wild guess as it. There will be an extension if the extension is communicated by the server as per standards. What a blown-out-of-proportion thing to give a permanent 1 star for anyway, as if that's all there is to it and as if it's any addon's fault a server decides not to expose extensions. Stupid "reviews" - more like baseless whines - like this are why I'm done developing for the public anyway.- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14624091 , há um ano
Resposta do programador
publicado a há 2 anosSome websites do things to stop addons like this from working, and I can't change that. But the addon definitely works on sites that don't take such countermeasures. I use it myself in the latest firefox, as do many other happy reviewers. Don't use reviews for misplaced and false bug reports, they belong in an email with proper information like which site you're trying to use it on. Simply writing "doesn't work" is an utter waste of everyone's time and blatantly wrong.- Avaliado em 1 de 5por ragernothingworks , há 2 anosIt just does not work, you can click all you like, it won't download on Firefox.
Resposta do programador
publicado a há 2 anosSorry but I'm using firefox and this addon myself, and it definitely works, as it does for other people too. There are some sites that do things that prevent addons like this from working (e.g. clickable overlays on images), you may be trying to use it on such a site. Fair enough it doesn't work then but that's no basis to say this addon never works. Please use reviews only for serious, well prepared review content. - Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14044871 , há 2 anos
Resposta do programador
publicado a há 9 mesesA few dozen thousand people certainly feel it does, I just can't promise it works on every website and every image.- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Nijaz Muratović , há 4 anosgood except that it does not automatically add extension to images that do not have it in file name, EDIT: Sorry, but it does! Take look at other extensions that manipulate file names like Image Max URL, Download All Images, Save Page WE, SingleFile...
Resposta do programador
publicado a há 4 anosThanks for the simple and honest summary. For fairness' sake, just know that firefox specifically does not even implement the download renaming API. Firefox addons could not add a missing extension even if the developer really wanted to.
Edit/reply: not in the way you think. Those addons determine their own filename from a bunch of guesswork. I consider that an anti-feature and want to leave the initial naming to the browser. - Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14340167 , há 5 anos
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14571966 , há 6 anosHáganlo compatible con Android por favor
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13404543 , há 7 anos
Resposta do programador
publicado a há 7 anosYou should really explain why. I know there are issues with it, but the essentials work fine. Resposta do programador
publicado a há 7 anos"save as" is built into every browser. This addon is for people who want to skip that. Not my fault you expect something from my addon that isn't its goal.- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13774596 , há 7 anos
Resposta do programador
publicado a há 7 anosYou should really include a reason why you rate it lowly. If your problem is the recent bug with firefox 58.0.1 where the "save as" dialog appears, that's a firefox bug I can't reproduce (nor fix) so far. Bugs are not allowed as motivation for downrating an addon on AMO, exactly because of situations like this.