Double-click Image Downloader에 대한 리뷰
Double-click Image Downloader 제작자: Marnes
리뷰 30개
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 13323778 님, 2달 전Great addon, if it could support custom download location it would be 5 star.
- 5점 만점에 4점ProtonLover 님, 일 년 전Only site this doesn't work on is pixiv is there a workaround at all if so? getting SERVER_FORBIDDEN
개발자 답글
9달 전에 게시됨Sorry, they probably detect hotlinking (i.e. direct downloading) specifically to stop addons like this. Thank you for giving a reasonable rating to a functioning product, unlike all the petulant reviewers that go straight to 1 star for the silliest reasons as if it's a completely defective piece of junk. - It's a good extension, it downloads orginal size image with Double-click, but it downloads image with random name & without extension (.webp, .jpg, etc). The image that is hyper-link too, you can right-click on image to download it, what it needs is to download image with page title name & with extension (.webp, .jpg, etc).
개발자 답글
9달 전에 게시됨Filenames and extensions depend entirely on the hosting server. Renaming using a.o. the page title is implemented but not supported by firefox itself. Thank you for the reasonable rating, all things considered, unlike the way some people rate projects. - 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 13140755 님, 4년 전
개발자 답글
4년 전에 게시됨Certainly a fair remark, though just for clarity I'd like to point out this is simply the nature of twitter's image hosting/linking, not a shortcoming in the addon. File extensions are a mere semantic convention and mostly only relevant in filesystems for human users. In HTTP-hosted resources, they're a mere courtesy a server/URL can decide not to offer. Other websites will similarly not include a file extension, and there's little an addon or browser can do about it (especially in firefox, which still doesn't implement filename manipulation for addons).
I just checked again, and the file extension could be derived from other data in twitter's URLs, but it would require both the missing renaming implementation in firefox as well as special handling code in my addon just for twitter. The latter I indeed choose not to implement, even for the chrome-based browsers that would support it. :)- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 16033589 님, 5년 전
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 15950359 님, 5년 전Super fast to save images!
I would like to have an option to auto add a timestamp in filename when saving, to have: timestamp+original filename.
Thank you개발자 답글
5년 전에 게시됨That's not a bad idea, though the exact format will be an issue, and you could achieve this through your file manager and a renaming program, but that's understandably more effort. Maybe I can add y/m/d h/m/s variables that you can use as desired. I'm slogging through technical work on my addons right now and don't expect to work on new features for some time still though. Please follow progress or discuss here: https://gitlab.com/Marnes/doubleclick-image-downloader/-/issues/78 - 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 12284220 님, 5년 전
- Hi, and thanks for all the work, that is first. The second, why I gave 3 stars, is due to 2 issues: First, it often save image without proper extension, which is a bit annoying, and second, it does not allow to save images where Save images as.... has been disabled, and I know it is not your fault, just to re-report, as I read the comments first. So, the biggest issue is extension flaw, sometimes.
Thanks for the reply - it is just then a question how the Save image as does not make that mistake....
In any way, I raised the review for one star :)개발자 답글
5년 전에 게시됨Thanks for the detailed feedback. As for file extensions, extensions are not actually a required thing in filenames, they're more of a loose convention. Websites tend to forego them depending on how their images are loaded (e.g. from data streams rather than files). It's the browser's responsibility to determine an extension if at all possible, based on data from the webserver if provided (such as a suggested filename, with or without extension). It's really not within an addon's power to ensure the presence of file extensions, or infer any, sorry. - 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 14680850 님, 6년 전
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 15109533 님, 6년 전
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 14960896 님, 6년 전
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 14622286 님, 6년 전
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 13693519 님, 6년 전
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 13150915 님, 7년 전Does what it says and works really well, but the options are limited. Some people might like that but I prefer the flexibility. The more you can customize the add-on, the less add-ons you need overall to get it to do what you want,
For instance, I'd really like to disabled it in the context menu but there's no such option. - 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 13662969 님, 7년 전Does a great job, I am using the hover over image for one click saving of images, would be great to be able to choose the default download folder for the images.
Thank you.개발자 답글
7년 전에 게시됨Glad you like it. Choosing a custom downloads folder will not be done: it's a bad idea and not even possible in/allowed by any browser anyway. All downloads in a browser will always go to the browser's download folder (or a subfolder within it). - 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 13548285 님, 7년 전I like the double click feature to save images.
However, for the FireFox 57.0.1 version does not allow selecting of save location, it saves it to 'Download' folder.
Keep up the good work.
Thanks.
M - 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 13533262 님, 7년 전