Recensioni per Double-click Image Downloader
Double-click Image Downloader di Marnes
13 recensioni
- Valutata 1 su 5di yensama, un anno fa
Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il un anno faAs mentioned many times before (I should add this to the FAQ part), it depends on the website, this observation is not global. Many servers provide filename extensions one way or another, but e.g. twitter doesn't in any way (because websites don't need to) and my addon can't just take a wild guess as it. There will be an extension if the extension is communicated by the server as per standards. What a blown-out-of-proportion thing to give a permanent 1 star for anyway, as if that's all there is to it and as if it's any addon's fault a server decides not to expose extensions. Stupid "reviews" - more like baseless whines - like this are why I'm done developing for the public anyway.- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 14624091, un anno fa
Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 2 anni faSome websites do things to stop addons like this from working, and I can't change that. But the addon definitely works on sites that don't take such countermeasures. I use it myself in the latest firefox, as do many other happy reviewers. Don't use reviews for misplaced and false bug reports, they belong in an email with proper information like which site you're trying to use it on. Simply writing "doesn't work" is an utter waste of everyone's time and blatantly wrong.- Valutata 1 su 5di ragernothingworks, 2 anni faIt just does not work, you can click all you like, it won't download on Firefox.
Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 2 anni faSorry but I'm using firefox and this addon myself, and it definitely works, as it does for other people too. There are some sites that do things that prevent addons like this from working (e.g. clickable overlays on images), you may be trying to use it on such a site. Fair enough it doesn't work then but that's no basis to say this addon never works. Please use reviews only for serious, well prepared review content. - Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 14044871, 2 anni fa
Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 9 mesi faA few dozen thousand people certainly feel it does, I just can't promise it works on every website and every image.- Valutata 1 su 5di Nijaz Muratović, 4 anni fagood except that it does not automatically add extension to images that do not have it in file name, EDIT: Sorry, but it does! Take look at other extensions that manipulate file names like Image Max URL, Download All Images, Save Page WE, SingleFile...
Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 4 anni faThanks for the simple and honest summary. For fairness' sake, just know that firefox specifically does not even implement the download renaming API. Firefox addons could not add a missing extension even if the developer really wanted to.
Edit/reply: not in the way you think. Those addons determine their own filename from a bunch of guesswork. I consider that an anti-feature and want to leave the initial naming to the browser. - Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 14340167, 5 anni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 13404543, 7 anni fa
Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 7 anni faYou should really explain why. I know there are issues with it, but the essentials work fine. Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 7 anni fa"save as" is built into every browser. This addon is for people who want to skip that. Not my fault you expect something from my addon that isn't its goal.- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 13774596, 7 anni fa
Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 7 anni faYou should really include a reason why you rate it lowly. If your problem is the recent bug with firefox 58.0.1 where the "save as" dialog appears, that's a firefox bug I can't reproduce (nor fix) so far. Bugs are not allowed as motivation for downrating an addon on AMO, exactly because of situations like this.