Beoardielingen foar SingleFile
SingleFile troch gildas
976 beoardielingen
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Radu Bogoevici, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Cormchij, 5 jierren lynTried a lot of extensions. Your best. But it cuts the length of the file name by 140 characters. This is inconvenient. Can I remove this restriction?
Antwurd ûntwikkeler
5 jierren lyn pleatstThank you. You can update the hidden option "filenameMaxLength" for that. See https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile/wiki/Hidden-options for more info about how to change hidden options. Feel free to contact me if you need help. - Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch dinor studio, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch NocedaCloud, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Marce, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Wo, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch fuzzydorito, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch JavirtanLabs, 5 jierren lynI used to love the MAFF file format old add-on. I've been missing it till now. Your add-on works pretty well for me. The extra feature for editing (like highlighting) is way too cool. Thanks a lot!
My only question is, how much is this one better than SingleFileZ? I'm curious about that, I mean, why should I use SingleFile instead of SingleFileZ?
EDIT March/11/2020:
The Developer response to my question was pretty clear. Now I understand the differences very well. Thanks a lot for your answer and awesome work!Antwurd ûntwikkeler
5 jierren lyn pleatstThank you for the review. I would say that the main advantage of SingleFile over SingleFileZ is that pages saved with SingleFile do not require JavaScript to be enabled in order to be displayed. In other words, if you want to save your pages as "pure" HTML files, use SingleFile. If you prefer to save them as zip files disguised as HTML pages, use SingleFileZ.
Note that SingleFile allows you to edit the page with the editor you refer to (I'm glad you like it). SingleFileZ cannot do this because it is more complicated to implement.
EDIT: Thank you! - Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13870051, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 3 fan 5troch triantafillia, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch 茶几上的猫, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Cherwally, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Arioh, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 14738141, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Idan Nabara, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch i18n, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch Marieli, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch Abe, 5 jierren lynMake sure to enable this for JavaScript (https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile/blob/master/faq.md#why-dont-interactive-elements-like-folding-titles-dynamic-maps-or-carousels-work-properly-in-saved-pages).
Works great! However, I really feel like saving scripts, audio elements, etc. should be enabled by default.Antwurd ûntwikkeler
5 jierren lyn pleatstThank you for the review. The default settings are optimized to produce light (and faithful) snapshot of pages because this was the most recurrent complain in the past. That's why the options you mentioned are disabled. Note also that disabling the option "remove scripts" can, unfortunately, lead to corrupted pages. - Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 15695469, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch chris-vecchio, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Shivam Patel, 5 jierren lyn