Bitwarden – 免费密码管理器 的评价
Bitwarden – 免费密码管理器 作者： Bitwarden Inc.
Gongloss 的评价
UPDATED REVIEW: It's even worse than I thought. I'm in the middle of using a web interface to configure a linux server, and discovered that every time I open a user for any of the services on the server, this plugin shoves the main login for the control panel into anything, on any page or subdomain, that it thinks might be a login, even if there's already something there, causing all my previously configured account I edit for any service—MySql users, FTP users, everything—to be overwritten with my root login and password without my realizing it every time I so much as want to change an option for them. I am lowering my rating from 2 stars to 1 star and uninstalling this plugin. Bitwarden is now not just annoying to use, it's now actually destructive, it's destroyed my server account configurations because of this inexcusably poor design. I am uninstalling BitWarden and will never touch it again with a ten foot pole. This is beyond a nightmare.
I should have guessed. I knew that including 2FA and password storage in the same service was incredibly dangerous and lousy design, and I went ahead and thought I could use the features anyway and they'd be ok. I should have known.
PREVIOUS REVIEW:
This plugin is terrible.
What good is a password manager if the auto-fill is broken? 9 times out of 10, even though BitWarden does have a login saved for a site, if I go to that site, I have to manually open BitWarden to look up the login because the autofill, which I do have turned on, simply does not work.
(And on the 10th time, it takes so long to autofill it that I have given up on waiting and started to type it, and THEN it tacks the password onto the end of what I've already typed, so I have to reload the page and wait for the autofill again.)
I might as well just save my logins in a text file.
Disgraceful and frustrating. I'm glad I didn't pay for this service.
I should have guessed. I knew that including 2FA and password storage in the same service was incredibly dangerous and lousy design, and I went ahead and thought I could use the features anyway and they'd be ok. I should have known.
PREVIOUS REVIEW:
This plugin is terrible.
What good is a password manager if the auto-fill is broken? 9 times out of 10, even though BitWarden does have a login saved for a site, if I go to that site, I have to manually open BitWarden to look up the login because the autofill, which I do have turned on, simply does not work.
(And on the 10th time, it takes so long to autofill it that I have given up on waiting and started to type it, and THEN it tacks the password onto the end of what I've already typed, so I have to reload the page and wait for the autofill again.)
I might as well just save my logins in a text file.
Disgraceful and frustrating. I'm glad I didn't pay for this service.
9,037 条评价
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 19238466， 7 小时前The latest version lags out enormously and uses a mind-boggling amount of RAM when logging in, making Firefox go from less than 1GB of RAM usage to just shy of 11GB. It freezes the whole browser for ~30 seconds while doing so, before finally letting all that RAM go and actually logging me in. I'm not sure if it's compromised, but I've tried reinstalling Bitwarden and I get the same results. The addon has been nearly flawless for years before, so I'm hoping this is just a temporary issue, but as it stands I find it unusable and highly suspicious about what exactly it's doing to use so much memory and freeze the browser.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 19236894， 20 小时前Very easy to set up and use and connect to your own vaultwarden server too. have not had any problems
- 评分 3 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 19233269， 2 天前The extension forces me to enter a password instead of using my biometrics. This error has been occurring for a few weeks; it worked flawlessly before.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18642201， 3 天前
- 评分 3 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 19230756， 3 天前Logs me out every few days even though I use it every day. This is insane.
- 评分 3 / 5来自 jesse james johnson， 6 天前
- I find it mind-boggling that the chromium version is at v2025.7.0, while the one on gecko is still at v2025.2.0, which is still dated March 21, 2025... why don't you update it? It's a great extension but I find that the version gap is just huge... the version on the add-ons is listed as v2025.6.1, but I can't update it on my browser I'm stuck on v2025.2.0
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18217017， 8 天前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 17961903， 13 天前Ich komme von einem anderen Schutz-/Tresorprogramm. Inzwischen setze ich Bitwarden seit ca. 4 Jahren ein.
Sehr gut gelungen ist die Synchronisierung zwischen der Android- und der Windowswelt auf verschiedenen Geräten. Gut gelungen sind (meistens - selten klemmt es anfangs bei Updates von Browsern) die Eintragungsmöglichkeiten im Browser von Firefox, Chrome, Edge, duckduckgo, u.ä..
Die Einstellungsmöglichkeiten sind vielfältig, aber es fehlen an allen Ecken und Enden Best-Practise-Beispiele, um zu verstehen, wie die unterschiedlichen Einstellungen effektiv genutzt werden könnten. (Excel hat genau solche für die Formelsammlung - hier würden sie ebenfalls effektiv helfen). So rätselt man gerne mal, was bei bestimmten Formulierungen in Hilfe, Beschriftungen, usw) wohl gemeint sein mag. Ein Beispiel? Auto-Ausfüllen => "Vorschläge anzeigen, wenn Symbol ausgewählt wird" => klar soweit? Symbole auf Handy, Desktop von PC, Menüleisten-Symbole .... ? Selbstgewählte Symbole auch?
Sicherheitstechnisch fühle ich mich gut aufgehoben. Kostet ja auch. - 评分 5 / 5来自 MightyKing， 14 天前
- switched from lastpass in 2015 after their systems were breached. turns out that was a good move because lastpass has been breached again in 2022 and 2023. bitwarden is opensource and has never suffered such security failures. its beautiful, easy to use, and packed with features, all for free.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Сергей Еглевский， 15 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14222031， 16 天前