Recensioner för NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite av Giorgio Maone
Recension av robsku
Betygsatt 5 av 5
av robsku, för 5 år sedanI'm sorry I wrote a bad review. It seems to be deleted, although it was not inappropriate - it was mistaken, and PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THIS *FEATURE*; whether intentional or not.
We now have a possibility to use Multi-Container support of Firefox with NoScript; I was very bummed by the missing of ABE from the WebExtension, but this can do some of the same thing; and without understanding the almost esoteric syntax.
See, I though the permissions I had set were disappearing. Turns out the page was in separate container than the last time I had allowed those permissions. The permissions are *CONTAINER SPECIFIC*. I hadn't really properly put Multi-User Container add-on really to good use!
Now I don't lose permissions. I can have certain (all possible to keep things working) Google servers blocked on default - same with any FaceBook servers. In fact, FaceBook servers are only allowed on FaceBook container. And if a site that does not belong to YouTube container, but needs to show video from YouTube, I either temporarily allow the servers, or I move the site into YouTube container; which needs a good good reason if it's not a Google's YouTube services. OR, I'll add another container for pages that don't need all the YouTube and Google servers allowed, but need to have just those allowed that let the videos roll; and move that site there. This is in fact incredibly great way to work, although I still miss the Legacy version - I will soon try changing to a fork that has all the modern support of FF, and support for legacy add-on's. Then I can use the original, and get the massive power of ABE, but will the Legacy code be updated to have same support for multiple containers? That I would love, best of both worlds.
I even have a container for MyWOT.com, which everyone should know already is a scam itself, but the user reviews are real - and great. So that container shouldn't be able to reach any info not loaded while in that very container. And only MyWOT.com ever is.
P.S. I'm 95% certain I wrote a bad review lately - I even deleted the old good one before that, so I didn't just imagine it all, as it's gone. So what happened?
P.P.S. I was really hard thinking of giving you five stars, because it was stated that all the features of legacy version were available here as well. Well, I remember a lot of settings I see nowhere; most notable of them being ABE rulesets. So I almost didn't, just 4; here's your 5 stars anyway ;)
FINALLY: You have to make users so clear about this multi-container feature, that they don't get mistaken like I did. If they use multi-containers, they should easily understand it; if not, what does it matter? ;) But definitely make it clear and clearly shown ;)
We now have a possibility to use Multi-Container support of Firefox with NoScript; I was very bummed by the missing of ABE from the WebExtension, but this can do some of the same thing; and without understanding the almost esoteric syntax.
See, I though the permissions I had set were disappearing. Turns out the page was in separate container than the last time I had allowed those permissions. The permissions are *CONTAINER SPECIFIC*. I hadn't really properly put Multi-User Container add-on really to good use!
Now I don't lose permissions. I can have certain (all possible to keep things working) Google servers blocked on default - same with any FaceBook servers. In fact, FaceBook servers are only allowed on FaceBook container. And if a site that does not belong to YouTube container, but needs to show video from YouTube, I either temporarily allow the servers, or I move the site into YouTube container; which needs a good good reason if it's not a Google's YouTube services. OR, I'll add another container for pages that don't need all the YouTube and Google servers allowed, but need to have just those allowed that let the videos roll; and move that site there. This is in fact incredibly great way to work, although I still miss the Legacy version - I will soon try changing to a fork that has all the modern support of FF, and support for legacy add-on's. Then I can use the original, and get the massive power of ABE, but will the Legacy code be updated to have same support for multiple containers? That I would love, best of both worlds.
I even have a container for MyWOT.com, which everyone should know already is a scam itself, but the user reviews are real - and great. So that container shouldn't be able to reach any info not loaded while in that very container. And only MyWOT.com ever is.
P.S. I'm 95% certain I wrote a bad review lately - I even deleted the old good one before that, so I didn't just imagine it all, as it's gone. So what happened?
P.P.S. I was really hard thinking of giving you five stars, because it was stated that all the features of legacy version were available here as well. Well, I remember a lot of settings I see nowhere; most notable of them being ABE rulesets. So I almost didn't, just 4; here's your 5 stars anyway ;)
FINALLY: You have to make users so clear about this multi-container feature, that they don't get mistaken like I did. If they use multi-containers, they should easily understand it; if not, what does it matter? ;) But definitely make it clear and clearly shown ;)
2 387 recensioner
- Betygsatt 3 av 5av Air, för 4 dagar sedanVery useful on a computer, however, enabling it by default on a mobile phone will block many important features, including but not limited to any AI features and video browsing
- Betygsatt 2 av 5av Firefox-användare 19157064, för 11 dagar sedanCompletely breaks reddit on mobile, site becomes unusable. I only got it for help blocking reddits creepy tracking bs on this browser.
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Cory Sanin, för 11 dagar sedanOne star for SidebarUtil.tab.js
Disruptive as hell and for what? Why do you need to know if I have a sidebar open? I don't even know what a sidebar is. Remove this nonsense. - Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 19145735, för 13 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av And?, för 17 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av A Tea Daze, för 18 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av srzlt, för 21 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av jordan9543, för 21 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av vit55555, för 22 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 18218075, för 23 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av fiendkaka, för 25 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Shannon Sobeck, för en månad sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Flyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, för en månad sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 19088604, för en månad sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av kk, för en månad sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 19072892, för en månad sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av cwqing1973, för en månad sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 14468519, för en månad sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av rabbitshee, för 2 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 19047433, för 2 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av A. Bilmanda, för 2 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Lazer Bear, för 2 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Sembler, för 2 månader sedan