Shqyrtime për NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite nga Giorgio Maone
Shqyrtim nga robsku
Vlerësuar me 5 yje nga 5 të mundshëm
nga robsku, 5 vite më parëI'm sorry I wrote a bad review. It seems to be deleted, although it was not inappropriate - it was mistaken, and PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THIS *FEATURE*; whether intentional or not.
We now have a possibility to use Multi-Container support of Firefox with NoScript; I was very bummed by the missing of ABE from the WebExtension, but this can do some of the same thing; and without understanding the almost esoteric syntax.
See, I though the permissions I had set were disappearing. Turns out the page was in separate container than the last time I had allowed those permissions. The permissions are *CONTAINER SPECIFIC*. I hadn't really properly put Multi-User Container add-on really to good use!
Now I don't lose permissions. I can have certain (all possible to keep things working) Google servers blocked on default - same with any FaceBook servers. In fact, FaceBook servers are only allowed on FaceBook container. And if a site that does not belong to YouTube container, but needs to show video from YouTube, I either temporarily allow the servers, or I move the site into YouTube container; which needs a good good reason if it's not a Google's YouTube services. OR, I'll add another container for pages that don't need all the YouTube and Google servers allowed, but need to have just those allowed that let the videos roll; and move that site there. This is in fact incredibly great way to work, although I still miss the Legacy version - I will soon try changing to a fork that has all the modern support of FF, and support for legacy add-on's. Then I can use the original, and get the massive power of ABE, but will the Legacy code be updated to have same support for multiple containers? That I would love, best of both worlds.
I even have a container for MyWOT.com, which everyone should know already is a scam itself, but the user reviews are real - and great. So that container shouldn't be able to reach any info not loaded while in that very container. And only MyWOT.com ever is.
P.S. I'm 95% certain I wrote a bad review lately - I even deleted the old good one before that, so I didn't just imagine it all, as it's gone. So what happened?
P.P.S. I was really hard thinking of giving you five stars, because it was stated that all the features of legacy version were available here as well. Well, I remember a lot of settings I see nowhere; most notable of them being ABE rulesets. So I almost didn't, just 4; here's your 5 stars anyway ;)
FINALLY: You have to make users so clear about this multi-container feature, that they don't get mistaken like I did. If they use multi-containers, they should easily understand it; if not, what does it matter? ;) But definitely make it clear and clearly shown ;)
We now have a possibility to use Multi-Container support of Firefox with NoScript; I was very bummed by the missing of ABE from the WebExtension, but this can do some of the same thing; and without understanding the almost esoteric syntax.
See, I though the permissions I had set were disappearing. Turns out the page was in separate container than the last time I had allowed those permissions. The permissions are *CONTAINER SPECIFIC*. I hadn't really properly put Multi-User Container add-on really to good use!
Now I don't lose permissions. I can have certain (all possible to keep things working) Google servers blocked on default - same with any FaceBook servers. In fact, FaceBook servers are only allowed on FaceBook container. And if a site that does not belong to YouTube container, but needs to show video from YouTube, I either temporarily allow the servers, or I move the site into YouTube container; which needs a good good reason if it's not a Google's YouTube services. OR, I'll add another container for pages that don't need all the YouTube and Google servers allowed, but need to have just those allowed that let the videos roll; and move that site there. This is in fact incredibly great way to work, although I still miss the Legacy version - I will soon try changing to a fork that has all the modern support of FF, and support for legacy add-on's. Then I can use the original, and get the massive power of ABE, but will the Legacy code be updated to have same support for multiple containers? That I would love, best of both worlds.
I even have a container for MyWOT.com, which everyone should know already is a scam itself, but the user reviews are real - and great. So that container shouldn't be able to reach any info not loaded while in that very container. And only MyWOT.com ever is.
P.S. I'm 95% certain I wrote a bad review lately - I even deleted the old good one before that, so I didn't just imagine it all, as it's gone. So what happened?
P.P.S. I was really hard thinking of giving you five stars, because it was stated that all the features of legacy version were available here as well. Well, I remember a lot of settings I see nowhere; most notable of them being ABE rulesets. So I almost didn't, just 4; here's your 5 stars anyway ;)
FINALLY: You have to make users so clear about this multi-container feature, that they don't get mistaken like I did. If they use multi-containers, they should easily understand it; if not, what does it matter? ;) But definitely make it clear and clearly shown ;)
2388 shqyrtime
- Vlerësuar me 3 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga Air, 12 ditë më parëVery useful on a computer, however, enabling it by default on a mobile phone will block many important features, including but not limited to any AI features and video browsing
- Vlerësuar me 2 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga 19157064 përdoruesi Firefox-i, 19 ditë më parëCompletely breaks reddit on mobile, site becomes unusable. I only got it for help blocking reddits creepy tracking bs on this browser.
- Vlerësuar me 1 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga Cory Sanin, 19 ditë më parëOne star for SidebarUtil.tab.js
Disruptive as hell and for what? Why do you need to know if I have a sidebar open? I don't even know what a sidebar is. Remove this nonsense. - Vlerësuar me 5 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga 19145735 përdoruesi Firefox-i, 21 ditë më parë
- Vlerësuar me 5 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga And?, 25 ditë më parë
- Vlerësuar me 5 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga A Tea Daze, 25 ditë më parë
- Vlerësuar me 5 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga srzlt, një muaj më parë
- Vlerësuar me 5 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga jordan9543, një muaj më parë
- Vlerësuar me 5 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga vit55555, një muaj më parë
- Vlerësuar me 5 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga 18218075 përdoruesi Firefox-i, një muaj më parë
- Vlerësuar me 5 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga fiendkaka, një muaj më parë
- Vlerësuar me 5 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga Shannon Sobeck, një muaj më parë
- Vlerësuar me 5 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga Flyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, një muaj më parë
- Vlerësuar me 5 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga 19088604 përdoruesi Firefox-i, një muaj më parë
- Vlerësuar me 5 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga kk, një muaj më parë
- Vlerësuar me 5 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga 19072892 përdoruesi Firefox-i, 2 muaj më parë
- Vlerësuar me 5 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga cwqing1973, 2 muaj më parë
- Vlerësuar me 5 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga 14468519 përdoruesi Firefox-i, 2 muaj më parë
- Vlerësuar me 5 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga rabbitshee, 2 muaj më parë
- Vlerësuar me 5 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga 19047433 përdoruesi Firefox-i, 2 muaj më parë
- Vlerësuar me 5 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga A. Bilmanda, 2 muaj më parë
- Vlerësuar me 5 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga Lazer Bear, 2 muaj më parë
- Vlerësuar me 5 yje nga 5 të mundshëmnga 19026513 përdoruesi Firefox-i, 2 muaj më parëTHANK YOU DEVELOPER!