Отзывы на SingleFile
SingleFile от gildas
976 отзывов
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Radu Bogoevici, 5 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Cormchij, 5 лет назадTried a lot of extensions. Your best. But it cuts the length of the file name by 140 characters. This is inconvenient. Can I remove this restriction?
Ответ разработчика
размещено 5 лет назадThank you. You can update the hidden option "filenameMaxLength" for that. See https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile/wiki/Hidden-options for more info about how to change hidden options. Feel free to contact me if you need help. - Оценено на 5 из 5от dinor studio, 5 лет назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от NocedaCloud, 5 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Marce, 5 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Wo, 5 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от fuzzydorito, 5 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от JavirtanLabs, 5 лет назадI used to love the MAFF file format old add-on. I've been missing it till now. Your add-on works pretty well for me. The extra feature for editing (like highlighting) is way too cool. Thanks a lot!
My only question is, how much is this one better than SingleFileZ? I'm curious about that, I mean, why should I use SingleFile instead of SingleFileZ?
EDIT March/11/2020:
The Developer response to my question was pretty clear. Now I understand the differences very well. Thanks a lot for your answer and awesome work!Ответ разработчика
размещено 5 лет назадThank you for the review. I would say that the main advantage of SingleFile over SingleFileZ is that pages saved with SingleFile do not require JavaScript to be enabled in order to be displayed. In other words, if you want to save your pages as "pure" HTML files, use SingleFile. If you prefer to save them as zip files disguised as HTML pages, use SingleFileZ.
Note that SingleFile allows you to edit the page with the editor you refer to (I'm glad you like it). SingleFileZ cannot do this because it is more complicated to implement.
EDIT: Thank you! - Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13870051, 5 лет назад
- Оценено на 3 из 5от triantafillia, 5 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от 茶几上的猫, 5 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Cherwally, 5 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Arioh, 5 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 14738141, 5 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Idan Nabara, 5 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от i18n, 5 лет назад
- Оценено на 4 из 5от Marieli, 5 лет назад
- Оценено на 4 из 5от Abe, 5 лет назадMake sure to enable this for JavaScript (https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile/blob/master/faq.md#why-dont-interactive-elements-like-folding-titles-dynamic-maps-or-carousels-work-properly-in-saved-pages).
Works great! However, I really feel like saving scripts, audio elements, etc. should be enabled by default.Ответ разработчика
размещено 5 лет назадThank you for the review. The default settings are optimized to produce light (and faithful) snapshot of pages because this was the most recurrent complain in the past. That's why the options you mentioned are disabled. Note also that disabling the option "remove scripts" can, unfortunately, lead to corrupted pages. - Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 15695469, 5 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от chris-vecchio, 5 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Shivam Patel, 5 лет назад