Análises para Malwarebytes Browser Guard
Malwarebytes Browser Guard por Malwarebytes
Análise por Tim
851 análises
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Regisea , há 7 horas
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 19003317 , há 9 dias
Resposta do programador
publicado a há 16 horasHi there, sorry to hear that. Is there anyway you could share more details at support.malwarebytes.com please?- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Fitsneezy543 , há 16 diasMalware bytes is my go to antivirus and now i can use it in my browser! (⊙o⊙)
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Hieu T. , há 17 dias
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18982496 , há 17 dias
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18971740 , há um mêsmb browser guard after latest update, does not keep saving the 3 tabs (ads, malware and scams) in the tab current website..uninstall or clear cache doesn't fix it. Except this, it doesn't recognize my premium subscription (device security is installed but it says upgrade to premium)
Resposta do programador
publicado a há 16 horasHi there, can you reach out at support.malwarebytes.com, please? We can better support you there. - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14924645 , há um mês
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 17762342 , há um mês
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18959063 , há um mês
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18959346 , há um mês
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por Greenstack , há um mêsI love the privacy and security options it gives, but any site that uses ReCaptcha fails to let me log in because the plugin disables and blocks it, so I need to disable the ads/trackers setting for those sites.
Resposta do programador
publicado a há 16 horasIf possible, can you share the sites with broken recaptcha on it please?
(support.malwarebytes.com) - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18639446 , há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 15340678 , há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18848060 , há 2 meses
Resposta do programador
publicado a há 16 horasWe are back to regular updates, thanks for holding on with us.- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 18925976 , há 2 mesesOverall, it’s good, but I’d like to see more details in the statistics—specifically, the types of malware that have been blocked, not just the numbers.
Also, the 'Access your data for all websites' option is listed as optional, but it’s necessary for the program to work. I know you’ve been pretty transparent about how the data is used, but this does raise some concerns about data security as the company isn’t open-source.Resposta do programador
publicado a há 15 horasThank you for the feedback, we'll take it into consideration.
With a premium subscription on Windows, you do get access to your detection history; not exactly what you asked for, but maybe you'll find it useful.
"Access your data for all websites" is indeed a required permission, and I do understand your concern. On Firefox, we don't collect any data. Full privacy policy is here: https://www.malwarebytes.com/privacy/policy-for-browser-guard.
If you are technically inclined, you can see all the requests Browser Guard makes by doing the following:
1. Navigate to about:debugging#/runtime/this-firefox
2. Next to Malwarebytes Browser Guard, click "Inspect"
3. Click "Network" in the new console that opens, from there you can see all network traffic Browser Guard is making. - Avaliado em 1 de 5por GlennS , há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Beatrice Veiga , há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por Disaster Area , há 2 mesesThis add-on is pretty good and helps prevent malware from being downloaded, as well as helps to avoid unsafe websites. However, today it started causing a massive memory leak whenever I opened my browser. My memory utilisation goes from about 40% with the add-on off to staying at 100% with the add-on active and websites will barely load. Hopefully this is fixed soon and I can re-enable the add-on.
Resposta do programador
publicado a há 15 horasThat's a bug we'd like more details on. Can you share more at support.malwarebytes.com, please? - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Lethologica , há 2 meses