Beoordelingen voor SingleFile
SingleFile door gildas
Beoordeling door Firefox-gebruiker 15950945
Waardering: 3 van 5
door Firefox-gebruiker 15950945, 5 jaar geledenGood idea in general but it seems to have problems with pictures, just an example
https://www.rotan2.pt/
Only the big picture at the top is visible after saving the page (and the text columns are changing from right to left and back again after the positions where the pictures are at the original page), no other pctures are shown, I checked ticking and unticking the picture options "Saving delayed pctures..." (not sure about "delayed", here in German "zurückgestellte Bilder") but this does not make any difference
UnMHT on Firefox 56 saves the page with all the pictures and I see it exactly as on my screen before saving it including the text columns at the right positions, too. (page saved with SingleFile is about 67 mb without pictures, page saved with UnMHT is about 44 mb and has all the pictures)
Edit: It was not meant as a bug report.
Website see above saved with SavePage WE (never used so far) is much smaller than the one saved with SingleFile but otherwise exactly looks the same that is without the pictures etc. No idea why, not comfortable of course, seems that the mht format was the much better option for me at least
https://www.rotan2.pt/
Only the big picture at the top is visible after saving the page (and the text columns are changing from right to left and back again after the positions where the pictures are at the original page), no other pctures are shown, I checked ticking and unticking the picture options "Saving delayed pctures..." (not sure about "delayed", here in German "zurückgestellte Bilder") but this does not make any difference
UnMHT on Firefox 56 saves the page with all the pictures and I see it exactly as on my screen before saving it including the text columns at the right positions, too. (page saved with SingleFile is about 67 mb without pictures, page saved with UnMHT is about 44 mb and has all the pictures)
Edit: It was not meant as a bug report.
Website see above saved with SavePage WE (never used so far) is much smaller than the one saved with SingleFile but otherwise exactly looks the same that is without the pictures etc. No idea why, not comfortable of course, seems that the mht format was the much better option for me at least
961 beoordelingen
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 19048867, 2 dagen geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door A. Bilmanda, 6 dagen geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door pnkntr, 13 dagen geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 19016964, 17 dagen geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Toukon, 23 dagen geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door ali, 25 dagen geleden
- Waardering: 4 van 5door tuxmux, 25 dagen geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 18680106, één maand geledenWorks exactly as advertised, finally pressing Ctrl+S actually does what it's supposed to instead of making a broken document.
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Soren, één maand geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door LCharlles, één maand geledenThis can deal with many pages that are not correctly saved in default setting of firefox
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 18978921, één maand geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door addonexplorer, één maand geledenExcellent archival tool! These days you cannot trust that any page will be available or drastically modified in the future.
SingleFile grabs everything or just parts, incredibly usefu and I use this along with Obsidian webclipper + Obsidian. - Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 18977738, één maand geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Goston, 2 maanden geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door OverLordGoldDragon, 2 maanden geleden
- Waardering: 5 van 5door Firefox-gebruiker 18702861, 2 maanden geledenI rarely give reviews but this one I must. It worked out of box. Can do things even FireShot can't such as saving the page or portion of it in a single html file! Very useful for saving a website or web page on Internet Archive.