NoScript Security Suite에 대한 리뷰
NoScript Security Suite 제작자: Giorgio Maone
리뷰 2,365개
개발자 답글
9달 전에 게시됨No it doesn't. Did you set also also ytimg.com, googlevideo.com, google.com and gstatic.com to TRUSTED (either globally or contextually to youtube.com)?- My review was removed. The latest update removed all settings, all sites that were whitelisted reverted to default i.e. untrusted, a hassle to restore since so many sites have a ridiculous amount of domains with cdn's and whatnot. I have now disabled automatic updates of this add-on because some (most) devs don't care if an "update" wreaks havoc as long as they get to constantly change something in their code, "if it aint broke, break it!" as their motto is.
개발자 답글
9달 전에 게시됨NoScript updates don't remove settings, but Firefox profiles and extensions storage may get corrupted, which is not something under the extension's control. - 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 18570138 님, 9달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 18187563 님, 9달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 17491234 님, 9달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점CCP養的LittlePink 님, 9달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 18310627 님, 9달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 18533204 님, 10달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 18290424 님, 10달 전
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 18138303 님, 10달 전
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 18525063 님, 10달 전A great piece of software that I use for years, but after latest update of either NoScript or Firefox all my settings and permissions were deleted and I have to start from 0. Really annoying.
- 5점 만점에 4점Klaas de Eindbaas 님, 10달 전It blocks scripts alright, no problem there, great job, it does exactly what it says it'll do, so a great rating suits. However, I haven't given it 5 stars because I'd like to see 2 features added, of which at least the first shouldn't be too hard to implement IMHO and the second probably not either, although I haven't looked at the code, nor have I ever scripted a FF plugin myself so I should stfu, I know.
Requested features:
1. export/save+import settings, so I can just import all my preferences instead of having to point it out to the plugin for each and every site again when I have a new machine/new OS install
2. settings per domain. Eg I wanna disable google's js-es everywhere, except then the drive.google.com becomes unresponsive, warning me that js needs to be allowed. So, I'd wish to allow google's js *only* when the address bar shows a google.com url and disable it on every other site.
Here, I'd like to list on which sites in this case google's js may be enabled, bc eg youtube.com (which for now actually doesn't seem to need google's js) is also from google, so I might wanna choose to allow it there as well (theoretically speaking) - If I had wanted to have a confusing list of scripts set free, I wouldn't install the add-on. In other words: preconfigured blank checks are bullshit. "We developers think what the user should want" is bullshit. It's the opposite of what NoScipt should be doing ("Allow potentially malicious web content to run **only from sites you** trust").
One star off for not even pointing this out.