User-Agent Switcher and Manager のレビュー
User-Agent Switcher and Manager 作成者: Ray
合計レビュー数: 98
- 5 段階中 1 の評価Firefox ユーザー 12376444 によるレビュー (1年前)Why it's so complicated to JUST SET USER AGENT TO SPECIFIC SITE?
- Graphical glitches while add-on was installed and link addresses were showing up in the bottom corner without the /s? Not sure what kind of bug this is? Removed the add-on and everything is fine now. Why would an add-on that is used to spoof the User-Agent mess with graphical and character memory?
- 5 段階中 1 の評価SphericalKat によるレビュー (1年前)
- 5 段階中 1 の評価Firefox ユーザー 12377692 によるレビュー (1年前)The option to change the global user agent "Apply (container or window)" doesn't work even on the website "webbrowsertools.com". Tested on Firefox 121.0.
- 5 段階中 1 の評価kimboinatl によるレビュー (1年前)Incredibly unintuitive, and does not seem to work on webbrowsertools.com.
- 5 段階中 1 の評価lamewater772 によるレビュー (1年前)All those websites with cloudfare security cant be accessed with this addon enabled. Wasted hours of time searching for the reason.
- 5 段階中 1 の評価Firefox ユーザー 17848704 によるレビュー (1年前)
- 5 段階中 1 の評価Firefox ユーザー 12934307 によるレビュー (2年前)Cloudflare, which vast majority of the U.S. sites and 20% of the world's websites use, does not like this app. Also, you ID is simply revealed by the http software you are using. Hence your ID will show as being faked.
- 5 段階中 1 の評価Firefox ユーザー 17112512 によるレビュー (2年前)
- 5 段階中 1 の評価underbelly によるレビュー (2年前)CPU heavy, and when using isolated tabs, you have issues, it wont go BROWSER WIDE... you have to set per tab n stuff, its a PAI, and ive heard the dev has shut up shop and its full of bugs
Mozilla need to re-review this and give the golden cup to another user agent that can be trusted! - Aside from the white and black lists, this extension also has a list of domains where the UA should never be spoofed. It's never stated that it exists, and I found it out only when I accidentally opened the settings. This list includes domains I was using this extension for, which means that my UA wasn't actually spoofed there. 1/5, many thanks for a privacy leakage for no apparent reason.