Recensiones de Smart Referer
Smart Referer per meh., ntninja
Recension de tama
Classificate 5 de 5
per tama, 4 jierren lynThanks for great addon!
Just one issue if you have time.
Somehow exception list doesn't seem working for instagram.com, even I put source "instagram.com" and destination "cdninstagram.com".
Firefox inspector still show faked referrer is sent.
Appreciated if you have time to look in.
Thanks.
Just one issue if you have time.
Somehow exception list doesn't seem working for instagram.com, even I put source "instagram.com" and destination "cdninstagram.com".
Firefox inspector still show faked referrer is sent.
Appreciated if you have time to look in.
Thanks.
75 recensiones
- Classificate 5 de 5per Krisna S. Putra, ien jier lyn
- Classificate 5 de 5per Lucas S., 2 jierren lyn
- Classificate 4 de 5per Usator de Firefox 14234915, 3 jierren lynPlease update the whitelist
https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/wiki/4.1-Extensions#-optional - Classificate 5 de 5per Bryan Hoang, 3 jierren lyn
- Classificate 3 de 5per kcufuoyeid, 3 jierren lynIt works for me, for the most part. I saw my firewall logs and somebody else mentioned some shady looking urls:
globalupload.io
gateway.ipfs.io
ipfs.infura.io
gateway.temporal.cloud
gateway.pinata.cloud
cloudflare-ipfs.io
dweb.link
It's crazy to have such checking for updates every startup at 24 hour internals with no way to change this is a bit excessive. I disabled whitelist. downloaded the whitelist , modified it to my own liking and stored it as a local file. This add-on would be vastly improved it had a easier to use and more intuitive interface for managing websites if they break. Last update was 3 years ago so I guess that's it for this add-on. - Classificate 2 de 5per rocksoccer, 3 jierren lynIt kind of does its job, but as many other reviews mentioned, whitelist is really such a bad idea for most people and most usage scenarios.
I only want to modify the referers for a particular website and that's all. Blacklist will be much better. I know it is not as so-called safe as whitelist, but it will become suitable for much more people. - Classificate 5 de 5per Artyom, 4 jierren lyn
- Classificate 5 de 5per Wojox, 4 jierren lyn
- Classificate 5 de 5per odysseus, 5 jierren lyn
- Classificate 4 de 5per Novakof, 5 jierren lyn
- Classificate 1 de 5per まさきん, 5 jierren lyn
- Classificate 4 de 5per Usator de Firefox 16037335, 5 jierren lyn
- Classificate 5 de 5per Mofiac, 5 jierren lyn
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 13541847, 6 jierren lyn
- Classificate 4 de 5per Usator de Firefox 14392904, 6 jierren lynIs it really required to use dweb infrastructure to get a tiny whitelist file? My FF shooting a bunch of requests to some shady looking urls:
globalupload.io
gateway.ipfs.io
ipfs.infura.io
gateway.temporal.cloud
gateway.pinata.cloud
cloudflare-ipfs.io
dweb.link
I thought I've got a malware when I saw that in my log files.
And it takes half an hour to figure out the source of suspicious web traffic. - Classificate 5 de 5per Anton, 6 jierren lyn
- Classificate 5 de 5per Сырное, 6 jierren lyn
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 15254132, 6 jierren lyn
- Classificate 1 de 5per _ztv, 6 jierren lynРасширение давно не работает, хватит звездочки ему ставить. Да и белый список давно не обновлялся.
- Classificate 1 de 5per Usator de Firefox 13386478, 6 jierren lynDoesn't seem to work. Simple settings in the FF's about:config work, however.
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 13864526, 6 jierren lyn
- Classificate 5 de 5per GammaGate, 6 jierren lyn
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 12338472, 6 jierren lyn