Recensiones de Request Interceptor
Request Interceptor per Vinay Kaparthi
14 recensiones
- Classificate 2 de 5per Patu, kaksi vuotta sittenA tutorial would be helpful. I can't get it to add the desired query.
- Classificate 1 de 5per Undefined, kaksi vuotta sitten
- Classificate 4 de 5per Max Yudin, kaksi vuotta sittenThe author aimed to create a progressive interface, but it turned out to be a flop.
Also, after the last update of the plugin, it opens its settings tab every time I open Firefox. What I should do to prevent this from happening is not specified anywhere.
Otherwise, the plugin does its job. - Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 16896802, kaksi vuotta sittenExcelent to manage requests, creating controled data scenarios between user and server.
- Classificate 2 de 5per Usator de Firefox 18051580, kaksi vuotta sittenuseless. can't auto respond and modify request body.
- Classificate 3 de 5per Usator de Firefox 15797138, kolme vuotta sittenIt works ok-ish. The interface could be somewhat clearer on when to save and how to enable. Also it seems like localhost throttling doesn't work. It does work when calling directly through deelay.me though.
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 17266305, kolme vuotta sitten
- Classificate 5 de 5per Andrea Pascal, neljä vuotta sittenIs source code available for this addon? The license is listed as BSD 2-clause.
- Classificate 3 de 5per Nishant Desai, neljä vuotta sittenthis extension is not working for me on locally hosted webapps, is that expected?
I'm using a similar extension in Chromium and it works on localhost sites just fine.
Any help is greatly appreciated. - Classificate 5 de 5per Ales, neljä vuotta sitten
- Classificate 5 de 5per Chklang, neljä vuotta sittenCan you add a feature to send a request/response content (headers+body) to an url as POST? (In JSON by example). I want to analyse some requests of a game to save some metadatas in my web site to centralize evolutions of my team.
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 16727644, neljä vuotta sittenVery easy to use. I needed to test some feature flag behaviour when key APIs failed in a web application. My only suggestion would be to make it more evident that the add-on needs to be switched on. The button is hidden away in the corner.
- Classificate 4 de 5per active x, viisi vuotta sitten
- Classificate 4 de 5per X, kuusi vuotta sittenI want to partially replace the url, such as replacing fonts.googleapis.com in https://fonts.googleapis.com//css?family=Roboto:300,400,500,700|Google+Sans:400,500 with fonts.loli.net;
contains is not work.For example, I configured to include translate.google.cn to perform the replace, but the result did not match.but starts-with with https://translate.google.cn is working.
When Request's -> URL -> Matches(RegEx) -> (.*)fonts.googleapis.com(.*)
Actions -> RedirectTo -> ${1}fonts.loli.net${2}
Is better,tksResponsa de disveloppator
publicate kuusi vuotta sittenConfigure the rule as below and give a try.
When Request's -> URL -> Matches(RegEx) -> https:\/\/fonts.googleapis.com\/(.*)
Actions -> RedirectTo -> https://fonts.loli.net/${1}