Recension de Usator de Firefox 13571266
Classificate 5 de 5
per Usator de Firefox 13571266, kaksi vuotta sitten17 recensiones
- Classificate 5 de 5per Lampe2020, seitsemän kuukautta sittenI don't know why this isn't core functionality in Firefox and why this extension isn't among Mozilla's "Recommended" either.
This extension is an immediate improvement, because I now have a much easier time understanding source files that I open in Firefox.
Some slight changes for this to be perfect would be to enable autodetect by default and to choose a more contrasty colour scheme by default (Qt Creator Light/Dark maybe) so the highlighted text doesn't fade into the background. - Classificate 5 de 5per MP3Martin, vuosi sitten
- Classificate 5 de 5per Mohammad Banisaeid, kaksi vuotta sitten
- Classificate 5 de 5per yazpower, kaksi vuotta sitten
- Classificate 4 de 5per Davide, kolme vuotta sittenSo it only works for RAW files, not on the pages itself, is that correct?
Thank you :-)Responsa de disveloppator
publicate kolme vuotta sittenYes, that's correct: raw files (with a few exceptions that won't work, those on raw.githubusercontent.com being a notable one).
We could technically inject the library code to colour elements on regular pages, but I wouldn't really know what to colour exactly, it depends too much on the page. Doing all `` blocks could be a thing maybe, or we could imagine adding a feature to selectively colour a block, but there's nothing of the sort supported by the add-on at the moment. - Classificate 5 de 5per OM_RA, kolme vuotta sittenIt does the job, although I wish it could work in the source code of web pages.
- Classificate 5 de 5per Vedun, neljä vuotta sitten
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 16892439, neljä vuotta sitten
- Classificate 3 de 5per weiss, kuusi vuotta sittenNot bad, but doesn't work on github RAW files, so it is pretty much useless for me :( Anyway, a custom scheme import functionality would be nice.
Responsa de disveloppator
publicate kuusi vuotta sittenThanks for the feedback, and sorry to hear that about the GitHub raw files :(. In case you haven't seen it already, there are explanations about it here [0].
For the color schemes, I'm relying on the schemes providing by highlight.js. I don't really have the motivation for adding an “import” feature (but would possibly accept a PR). I'll file an issue to acknowledge and keep track of the request, though.
[0] https://github.com/Qeole/Enlight/issues/8 - Classificate 4 de 5per Usator de Firefox 14068156, seitsemän vuotta sitten
- Classificate 5 de 5per slazil, seitsemän vuotta sittenOverall is excellent ext!
On note. Settings for autohilite and other one are not saved, so I must click 'autodetect' each time.Responsa de disveloppator
publicate seitsemän vuotta sittenThanks for using the add-on, and for your feedback!
If the settings are not saved, this is a bug, I'll try to investigate. Any chance you can tell me about your OS and Firefox version, please? Here or on this GitHub issue: https://github.com/Qeole/Enlight/issues/9 - Classificate 4 de 5per enderandpeter, seitsemän vuotta sittenI thought it was missing PHP, but it was just not in an obvious place. There's an initial list of what I guess are commonly requested languages and then suddenly it's an alphabetical list. Maybe the whole thing should be alphabetical for such a long list.
Responsa de disveloppator
publicate seitsemän vuotta sittenThank you for the feedback!
The library that is used by the add-on makes a distinction between a set of “most-common languages”, and all other languages it supports. For technical reasons, this add-on initially supported just this restricted set of languages. When I added all the other ones (including PHP), I appended them to the list. So in fact this makes two alphabetical lists: a first one with the “most-common languages” (as presented by the library, I'm not actually trying to classify languages here), and a second one below, with all other languages.
I understand that this might be confusing. Maybe I will change it in the future. Ideally, I would like to implement an option to switch between the complete list of languages, or just the restricted subset. One advantage would be that auto-detection goes much faster when the library is compiled for fewer languages…
Anyway, thanks again! - Classificate 4 de 5per Ludwig, seitsemän vuotta sittenWorks. However, the settings could be better. It's hard to find a good, bright color scheme without a quick preview.
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 13189945, kahdeksan vuotta sitten
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 12504175, kahdeksan vuotta sittenThanks for the update to the new framework!
- Classificate 5 de 5per jalcine, kahdeksan vuotta sitten