Very dark. Too dark, even. Black text on black background.

Edit: had to restart Firefox, works fine now. I guess.

Current version is probably the most perfect dark mode for wikipedia. Thank you.

Bugs with tables (see XCOM english page), windows with "Display. Set language used for menus and fonts. Input. Writing in a different language?" text. Mozilla Firefox 128.0 (64-bit).

Decent enough. The logo remaining unchanged bothers me a little, but it's not bad at all.

Leider sind die Schriften so dunkel das viele Schriftteile kaum lesbar sind.
Würde mich freuen wenn man den Darkmode 'einstellen' könnte.
Nutze FF ESR in der aktuellsten Version auf macOS Catalina
Würde mich ggf. über Feedback vom Programmierer freuen.

This add-on works really well. Only issue is that e.g. company logos which are often vector graphics without a background may be very hard to see with a black background. Maybe something can be done about that.

All in all okay, but there is a big problem with equations (when using this with firefox on ubuntu)

edit: it works fine, when using the MathML plugin as well! hf

The gradients in article previews are inverted

Mostly fine. Some tables with colored cells may show unwanted results. Equations rendered by SVG cannot be clearly seen.

(22/9/3 updated)
Thank you for response. I took an example from the "Duodecimal" page: the notations in svg, and the columns of the two digit conversion tables cannot be clearly seen due to their color schemes.

My eyes are now spared from long-term destruction by the blinding default wikipedia background. Thanks!

So far so good, but there are things that may be pissible to improve. F.e. search Pink Floyd on wikipedia (german version, de), see the table of musicians. Maybe something easy to fix. But like it is very helpful, thanks.

Works great! Thanks.

I gave the extension a bad rating because it worked bad for me and I found a solution that worked better for me by using Wikipedia's own dark mode in Preferences > Gadgets. The rating is solely based on my own experience for my specific use case.

The author then proceeded to look up my user name on social media, stalk me there, made me explain myself, and then went on telling me that my personal experience is wrong because other people have other uses.

This was exactly what I'd been wanting for a long time, but never taken the time to see if it actually existed. Thank you.