Recensiones de Web Archives
Web Archives per Armin Sebastian
Recension de KirkH420
Classificate 4 de 5
per KirkH420, 3 năm trướcIt works to some extent, I like it's ability to open all the different web archives with one click.
There is a bit of an issue with some archives. For URLs: When I click on an URL to a Microsoft.com out-dated page, the Wayback Machine will take me to Microsoft's Error404 landing page.
This URL for example:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885
When passed to this add-on, the Wayback Machine converts it to this page:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220328035922/https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/404Error.aspx
*It's landing on a Wayback Redirect page. After 5 seconds, the page gets redirected to another page.
We can see in the date is /2022-03-28-03:59:22/ and this is one of the newest snapshots created by the Archive. It's unfortunate, but The Wayback Machine continues to create snapshots of these 404 pages.
So someone might say, why don't you just use the Wayback Date-toolbar to turn back to an older date? The problem is, since your tool is finding the newest snapshots, it's returning these 404 pages. This changes the URL that we're searching for.
The API docs for the Wayback Machine says "timestamp is the timestamp to look up in Wayback. If not specified, the most recenty available capture in Wayback is returned."
The correct way to use the API is to create a link like this:
http://archive.org/wayback/available?url=https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885×tamp=20010101
*This will return a .json that contains a working "closest snapshot" URL and you can click on it.
It appears that this add-on is not using the API but is trying to manipulate URLs instead. This wont work well.
If you add the "×tamp=20010101" key, it will enable the "Return closest snapshot to the date 2001-01-01" rather than return the newest available snapshot. The downside is, you'll need to write something that will handle the .json API return data. (which shouldn't be very hard)
Doing it that way will ALWAYS return a website. Not those Error404 landing pages.
There is a bit of an issue with some archives. For URLs: When I click on an URL to a Microsoft.com out-dated page, the Wayback Machine will take me to Microsoft's Error404 landing page.
This URL for example:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885
When passed to this add-on, the Wayback Machine converts it to this page:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220328035922/https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/404Error.aspx
*It's landing on a Wayback Redirect page. After 5 seconds, the page gets redirected to another page.
We can see in the date is /2022-03-28-03:59:22/ and this is one of the newest snapshots created by the Archive. It's unfortunate, but The Wayback Machine continues to create snapshots of these 404 pages.
So someone might say, why don't you just use the Wayback Date-toolbar to turn back to an older date? The problem is, since your tool is finding the newest snapshots, it's returning these 404 pages. This changes the URL that we're searching for.
The API docs for the Wayback Machine says "timestamp is the timestamp to look up in Wayback. If not specified, the most recenty available capture in Wayback is returned."
The correct way to use the API is to create a link like this:
http://archive.org/wayback/available?url=https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885×tamp=20010101
*This will return a .json that contains a working "closest snapshot" URL and you can click on it.
It appears that this add-on is not using the API but is trying to manipulate URLs instead. This wont work well.
If you add the "×tamp=20010101" key, it will enable the "Return closest snapshot to the date 2001-01-01" rather than return the newest available snapshot. The downside is, you'll need to write something that will handle the .json API return data. (which shouldn't be very hard)
Doing it that way will ALWAYS return a website. Not those Error404 landing pages.
317 recensiones
- Classificate 4 de 5per dost, 10 ngày trước
- Classificate 5 de 5per frostbyte, 12 ngày trước
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 19173586, 12 ngày trước
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 19114790, 14 ngày trước
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 18905802, 16 ngày trước
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 19145735, 16 ngày trước
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 19128233, 22 ngày trước
- Classificate 5 de 5per casi dancasy, một tháng trước
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 19096545, một tháng trước
- Classificate 5 de 5per wertzuz, 2 tháng trước
- Classificate 5 de 5per Kay, 2 tháng trước
- Classificate 5 de 5per Kasander, 3 tháng trước
- Classificate 5 de 5per selmasoken, 3 tháng trước
- Classificate 1 de 5per Happy, 4 tháng trướcYou're better off just manually visiting the archive websites. Here's a suggestion, instead of opening a specific snapshot, open the snapshots (or history) page where the user can see (if) different snapshots and play around till they find the one that works. This will reduce the number of times the user gets "No results"
- Classificate 5 de 5per BatsRule, 4 tháng trước
- Classificate 1 de 5per Sione, 4 tháng trước
- Classificate 5 de 5per Maximilian Grothusmann, 4 tháng trước
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 15254436, 4 tháng trước
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 18866863, 5 tháng trước
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 18248595, 5 tháng trước
- Classificate 5 de 5per VaRLoK, 5 tháng trước
- Classificate 5 de 5per stop5, 5 tháng trước
- Classificate 5 de 5per GothGlamPrincess, 5 tháng trước
- Classificate 5 de 5per BillKoochooloo, 5 tháng trước
- Classificate 5 de 5per bunnie, 6 tháng trước