Recensiones de SingleFile
SingleFile per gildas
950 recensiones
- Classificate 5 de 5per Cormchij, prije 5 godinaTried a lot of extensions. Your best. But it cuts the length of the file name by 140 characters. This is inconvenient. Can I remove this restriction?
Responsa de disveloppator
publicate prije 5 godinaThank you. You can update the hidden option "filenameMaxLength" for that. See https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile/wiki/Hidden-options for more info about how to change hidden options. Feel free to contact me if you need help. - Classificate 5 de 5per dinor studio, prije 5 godina
- Classificate 1 de 5per NocedaCloud, prije 5 godina
- Classificate 5 de 5per Marce, prije 5 godina
- Classificate 5 de 5per Wo, prije 5 godina
- Classificate 5 de 5per fuzzydorito, prije 5 godina
- Classificate 5 de 5per JavirtanLabs, prije 5 godinaI used to love the MAFF file format old add-on. I've been missing it till now. Your add-on works pretty well for me. The extra feature for editing (like highlighting) is way too cool. Thanks a lot!
My only question is, how much is this one better than SingleFileZ? I'm curious about that, I mean, why should I use SingleFile instead of SingleFileZ?
EDIT March/11/2020:
The Developer response to my question was pretty clear. Now I understand the differences very well. Thanks a lot for your answer and awesome work!Responsa de disveloppator
publicate prije 5 godinaThank you for the review. I would say that the main advantage of SingleFile over SingleFileZ is that pages saved with SingleFile do not require JavaScript to be enabled in order to be displayed. In other words, if you want to save your pages as "pure" HTML files, use SingleFile. If you prefer to save them as zip files disguised as HTML pages, use SingleFileZ.
Note that SingleFile allows you to edit the page with the editor you refer to (I'm glad you like it). SingleFileZ cannot do this because it is more complicated to implement.
EDIT: Thank you! - Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 13870051, prije 5 godina
- Classificate 3 de 5per triantafillia, prije 5 godina
- Classificate 5 de 5per 茶几上的猫, prije 5 godina
- Classificate 5 de 5per Cherwally, prije 5 godina
- Classificate 5 de 5per Arioh, prije 5 godina
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 14738141, prije 5 godina
- Classificate 5 de 5per Idan Nabara, prije 5 godina
- Classificate 5 de 5per i18n, prije 5 godina
- Classificate 4 de 5per Marieli, prije 5 godina
- Classificate 4 de 5per Abe, prije 5 godinaMake sure to enable this for JavaScript (https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile/blob/master/faq.md#why-dont-interactive-elements-like-folding-titles-dynamic-maps-or-carousels-work-properly-in-saved-pages).
Works great! However, I really feel like saving scripts, audio elements, etc. should be enabled by default.Responsa de disveloppator
publicate prije 5 godinaThank you for the review. The default settings are optimized to produce light (and faithful) snapshot of pages because this was the most recurrent complain in the past. That's why the options you mentioned are disabled. Note also that disabling the option "remove scripts" can, unfortunately, lead to corrupted pages. - Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 15695469, prije 5 godina
- Classificate 5 de 5per chris-vecchio, prije 5 godina
- Classificate 5 de 5per Shivam Patel, prije 5 godina
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 15160037, prije 5 godina