Critiques pour SingleFile
SingleFile par gildas
Avis de Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15950945 de Firefox
Noté 3 sur 5
par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15950945 de Firefox, il y a 5 ansGood idea in general but it seems to have problems with pictures, just an example
https://www.rotan2.pt/
Only the big picture at the top is visible after saving the page (and the text columns are changing from right to left and back again after the positions where the pictures are at the original page), no other pctures are shown, I checked ticking and unticking the picture options "Saving delayed pctures..." (not sure about "delayed", here in German "zurückgestellte Bilder") but this does not make any difference
UnMHT on Firefox 56 saves the page with all the pictures and I see it exactly as on my screen before saving it including the text columns at the right positions, too. (page saved with SingleFile is about 67 mb without pictures, page saved with UnMHT is about 44 mb and has all the pictures)
Edit: It was not meant as a bug report.
Website see above saved with SavePage WE (never used so far) is much smaller than the one saved with SingleFile but otherwise exactly looks the same that is without the pictures etc. No idea why, not comfortable of course, seems that the mht format was the much better option for me at least
https://www.rotan2.pt/
Only the big picture at the top is visible after saving the page (and the text columns are changing from right to left and back again after the positions where the pictures are at the original page), no other pctures are shown, I checked ticking and unticking the picture options "Saving delayed pctures..." (not sure about "delayed", here in German "zurückgestellte Bilder") but this does not make any difference
UnMHT on Firefox 56 saves the page with all the pictures and I see it exactly as on my screen before saving it including the text columns at the right positions, too. (page saved with SingleFile is about 67 mb without pictures, page saved with UnMHT is about 44 mb and has all the pictures)
Edit: It was not meant as a bug report.
Website see above saved with SavePage WE (never used so far) is much smaller than the one saved with SingleFile but otherwise exactly looks the same that is without the pictures etc. No idea why, not comfortable of course, seems that the mht format was the much better option for me at least
961 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19048867 de Firefox, il y a une heure
- Noté 5 sur 5par A. Bilmanda, il y a 3 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par pnkntr, il y a 11 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19016964 de Firefox, il y a 15 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Toukon, il y a 21 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par ali, il y a 23 jours
- Noté 4 sur 5par tuxmux, il y a 23 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18680106 de Firefox, il y a un moisWorks exactly as advertised, finally pressing Ctrl+S actually does what it's supposed to instead of making a broken document.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Soren, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par LCharlles, il y a un moisThis can deal with many pages that are not correctly saved in default setting of firefox
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18978921 de Firefox, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par addonexplorer, il y a un moisExcellent archival tool! These days you cannot trust that any page will be available or drastically modified in the future.
SingleFile grabs everything or just parts, incredibly usefu and I use this along with Obsidian webclipper + Obsidian. - Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18977738 de Firefox, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Goston, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par OverLordGoldDragon, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18702861 de Firefox, il y a 2 moisI rarely give reviews but this one I must. It worked out of box. Can do things even FireShot can't such as saving the page or portion of it in a single html file! Very useful for saving a website or web page on Internet Archive.