Critiques pour SingleFile
SingleFile par gildas
Avis de browser.tech
Noté 4 sur 5
par browser.tech, il y a 5 ansI tried SingleFile briefly. It works. Looks like a well thought out and put together addon.
One thing I noticed, when you have the option enabled for "include the info bar in the saved page," the page actually shows a floating icon in the upper corner. If you click on this icon a flyout will indicate the time the page was saved, then if you hover over a tiny button on the flyout the original URL will popup. Clicking the tiny button takes you to the original URL.
This all looks nice, but I prefer the way Save Page WE does it. Save Page displays a fixed header bar with the full URL and time the page was saved. For someone like me who's always paying attention to the URL bar this is nicer. It's easier to understand that the page you're viewing is an archive, and easier to get to the original page with a single click.
Note that both the floating icon in SingleFile and the header bar in Save Page WE can be closed.
I also notice that neither SingleFile or Save Page WE works in FireFox reader view. A small thing, but it would be nice. That's what I was really looking for when I tried SingleFile.
One thing I noticed, when you have the option enabled for "include the info bar in the saved page," the page actually shows a floating icon in the upper corner. If you click on this icon a flyout will indicate the time the page was saved, then if you hover over a tiny button on the flyout the original URL will popup. Clicking the tiny button takes you to the original URL.
This all looks nice, but I prefer the way Save Page WE does it. Save Page displays a fixed header bar with the full URL and time the page was saved. For someone like me who's always paying attention to the URL bar this is nicer. It's easier to understand that the page you're viewing is an archive, and easier to get to the original page with a single click.
Note that both the floating icon in SingleFile and the header bar in Save Page WE can be closed.
I also notice that neither SingleFile or Save Page WE works in FireFox reader view. A small thing, but it would be nice. That's what I was really looking for when I tried SingleFile.
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 5 ansThanks for the review. It is technically impossible to make an add-on run in the reader view. However, you can format the page, as the reader view does, in the annotation editor by clicking the button "format the page for better readability" (page with glasses icon) when present.
957 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par Dmytro, il y a un jour
- Noté 5 sur 5par pnkntr, il y a 2 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19016964 de Firefox, il y a 7 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Toukon, il y a 12 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par ali, il y a 14 jours
- Noté 4 sur 5par tuxmux, il y a 14 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18680106 de Firefox, il y a 22 joursWorks exactly as advertised, finally pressing Ctrl+S actually does what it's supposed to instead of making a broken document.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Soren, il y a 25 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par LCharlles, il y a un moisThis can deal with many pages that are not correctly saved in default setting of firefox
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18978921 de Firefox, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par addonexplorer, il y a un moisExcellent archival tool! These days you cannot trust that any page will be available or drastically modified in the future.
SingleFile grabs everything or just parts, incredibly usefu and I use this along with Obsidian webclipper + Obsidian. - Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18977738 de Firefox, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Goston, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par OverLordGoldDragon, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18702861 de Firefox, il y a 2 moisI rarely give reviews but this one I must. It worked out of box. Can do things even FireShot can't such as saving the page or portion of it in a single html file! Very useful for saving a website or web page on Internet Archive.
- Noté 5 sur 5par stackingcows, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18935224 de Firefox, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18921230 de Firefox, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Lurker, il y a 2 mois