Revisiones de NoScript
NoScript por Giorgio Maone
2372 revisiones
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13509040, hace 8 años3 stars becauze of new Quantum firefox UI, before it it was just perfect, now it is just pure-brainfuck. I will welcome that weed which was smoked while making this nature-fatal-error UI. oh, and TOR still keeps old-fashined perfect UI <3
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por PET-FOX, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13508642, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13508459, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 12674645, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13508328, hace 8 añosI am still on FF 56 and generally happy with NoScript. After checking the FF57 status and reading what others wrote I felt compelled to do two things. First, I sent a complaint to Mozilla directly - not just about NoScript, but the whole debacle that the move to webextenions has become. They knew this would happen and let the train wreck continue any way.
Second, I am really disappointed at the vitriol directed at this developer. Most, if not all, of the blame is with Mozilla and that is where you should be directing your anger. Things that could be done pre 57 are no longer either a) allowed or b) possible or c) both.
I don't doubt that he is disappointed and angry too. One of the, if not the, most poplular extensions for years, and now kicked to the curb through little fault of his own. I'm sure he will continue to try to make it better but what is 'better' in 57+ will not ever be the same as the older versions. - Se valoró con 4 de 5por Reindl Harald, hace 8 añosthe android version don't block anything on FF57 and the UI on the desktop has ugly scrollbars here
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13507805, hace 8 añosThe old version was amazing, truly a power user's addon. The new version... well I understand that you had to rush a complete redesign and rewrite... but it's too bad that it lost a lot of functionality. On the up-side, I do like the new interface.
In particular I'd like to point out that the addon does not work in Private Browsing mode. Would it be possible to add back the Temporary Permissions feature and allow people to "Temporarily Allow" URL's for the duration of Private Browsing sessions? - Se valoró con 2 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13507402, hace 8 añosNew addon for Firefox Quantum is bad. Why is log.js open always. I always get 1.000 notification on console and it takes more CPU usage. New interface is worse than old one. I can't understand which domain is blocked or allowed.
I want old interface an system back. If you can't do same. Do it similar. Or work with good interface designer. I don't want to delete this add-on.
I hope you can fix all problems soon. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13507298, hace 8 añosVery useful extension. Happy to see the developer listened to our feedback.
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13507242, hace 8 añosHey guys, even the new gui is not comfortable as it used to be and so on...please consider this as a free addon and how much time is needed to update it concerning the new quantum firefox code - just give it some time and a fair chance instead of bashing around - giorgio, please go on with your good work, so we can all benefit from noscript again
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13507221, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por photografx, hace 8 añosThank you very much for your effort to make this work with "Quantum (57+)".
But please give us back some oft the ofunctionality and ease of use of the old version.
e.g. temporary allowing scripts
cheers - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13167791, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13507030, hace 8 añosActually a 5*, it might be language related but in germany the translations are way to long for the new interface (Words don't fit in the reserved space).
Sadly it looks really bad.
For the other stuff I like the uMatrix like way to control what gets loaded.
Also, even thought I need to look how it works somewhere, that we got some https contol looks promising. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Biohazard, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13506606, hace 8 añosthis version is too complicated to handle for me. I am not the read-a-long-guide-before-doing-anything-complicated guy, so I am missing simplicity and intuitivity. I loved the former versions.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13506290, hace 8 añosYESS ! Available for Firefox 57 !
Thank you.
This Add-on is a must have !
It allows you to browse the web securely. - Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 12641543, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13364029, hace 8 añosDidn't work with https://www.rnz.de/ (no Pic) and it isn't opssible to login here at my Mozilla Account and my googlemail account works only with simple HTML with noscript active.
Update 28.11.17 - Good Work! Now everything is fine. - Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13505686, hace 8 añosIt's not as functional as the original, and it took a while to figure out how to temporarily allow a script. You have to click twice on the trusted icon. The bottom line is it still works.
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13505627, hace 8 años1). As a regular NoScript user unfamiliar with code/script-related stuff, I must say this update is less UN-intuitive than the former and a bit more straightforward —still not a marvel in signage, indeed, but it never was, and seems it plays its role.
2). Mr. Maone is not obliged to respond to rude demands for his free, voluntary add-on. Those childish users calling us "bootlickers" hopefully will go away after another "better" (if possible) add-on, or even better, come with an improved one themselves. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13505381, hace 8 añosI can tell the developers working on all the gripes i had. Good work to you all, have always loved this app and will continue to support it.