Revisiones de NoScript
NoScript por Giorgio Maone
Revisado por Ferdinand
Se valoró con 5 de 5
por Ferdinand, hace 6 añosWorks great - the extra hassle of enabling scripts on a per domain basis is definitely worth it.
In order to limit the hassle though, I have a couple of suggestions:
1) Let us group permissions, and then allow and revoke those permission groups. As an example, I need to allow 2 out of 5 domains to use my bank, and when I'm done I want to revoke those permissions.
2) After importing huge block-lists, NoScript hangs for ages whenever I enter the settings - so maybe keep the lists of blocked and allowed domains separate from the other settings?
3) If I have marked a domain as untrusted, and later temporarily allow that domain, then, after revoking temporary permissions, the domain should be untrusted again, not default.
In order to limit the hassle though, I have a couple of suggestions:
1) Let us group permissions, and then allow and revoke those permission groups. As an example, I need to allow 2 out of 5 domains to use my bank, and when I'm done I want to revoke those permissions.
2) After importing huge block-lists, NoScript hangs for ages whenever I enter the settings - so maybe keep the lists of blocked and allowed domains separate from the other settings?
3) If I have marked a domain as untrusted, and later temporarily allow that domain, then, after revoking temporary permissions, the domain should be untrusted again, not default.
2370 revisiones
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por rabbitshee, hace 5 horas
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19047433, hace 3 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por A. Bilmanda, hace 5 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Lazer Bear, hace 5 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Sembler, hace 14 días
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 15056996, hace 24 díasissues with outdoorline.sk ; I have to stop Noscrypt to proceed with Payment gateway GP webpay
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por 镂心鉥肝, hace un mesNoScript还是很好的，不管是界面还是解释如何使用都进行了改进。不过，文章内容应该更加简洁一点。告诉用户每一个功能开关的意思。同时NoScript默认会阻止扩展脚本
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17847461, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18989716, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Max, hace un mesI really wanted to use NoScript. I prefer single-purpose extensions that focus on doing one job well, compared to more multi-purpose extensions like uBlock Origin.
However, I ultimately couldn't stick with it because the user experience did not suit my needs.
E.g. one mobile screen presents around 12 different icons packed into the height of 3 lines of text, leaving a large portion of the screen completely empty below them.
My main frustration is that none of these icons have labels. Expecting users to learn and memorize the meaning of a dozen different unlabeled symbols creates an unnecessary barrier to entry and makes using the extension quickly and efficiently very difficult. It feels counter-intuitive to leave so much screen real estate blank when that space could be used to label each icon and explain its function.
uBlock Origin is easier to use than NoScript. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por LittleFire, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Absinthe, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por thofree, hace un mesGets detected by Youtube's anti ad-block stuff. Wish you had a button to turn it off easily for a website without disabling it entirely.
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18920843, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18315395, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por VonD68, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por luis, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Retromania, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Luciano Rangel, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18924473, hace 2 meses