Revisiones de NoScript
NoScript por Giorgio Maone
166 revisiones
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por TTTony, hace 3 añosThe new re-skin is atrocious. Not sure why anyone thought it was a good idea to change the UI to a big, ugly, bubble-style(?) look. It's seriously hideous and like 30% larger than what it was previously for no good reason. The logos were also changed to mimic this style and I can't imagine why they thought it was an enhancement over how it looked previously. It looks flat out unprofessional. I guess it's finally time to move over to uBlock.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 3 añosPlease check 11.4.1rc1, where you can optionally get back the "Vintage Blue": https://noscript.net/getit#devel - Se valoró con 3 de 5por Nerdronaut, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13890872, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Usuário FF 17151627, hace 3 añosExtensão boa, mas por ser uma extensão recomendada no Firefox para Android a aparência da interface das configurações da mesma está fora da resolução de tela e sem quebra de linha no aplicativo e precisa melhorar a tradução do idioma pt-BR nas configurações e se possível adicione um submenu de escolha do idioma local do usuário na extensão.
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13343703, hace 3 añosThe extension reveals my browsing history and I can't protect it from other PC users
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13473646, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Kira, hace 4 años
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Karl Ottawa, hace 4 añosWas mir abgeht ist, eine Möglichkeit die Einstellungen zu synchen.
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Chaython, hace 4 añosIt's a great tool for extra privacy/security, but it misses some settings like there should be an option to allow first party script [I need to allow google, to login to youtube etc, but that shouldn't allow google to script on each website...], or a list of incompatible sites, that can auto-allow script...
Also with the newest firefox or one of my extensions, noscript makes browsing really slow. - Se valoró con 3 de 5por Zippy8, hace 4 añosLike the reviewer VoxPop I too began to have issues with this extension - which I have used for several years - quite recently. It appears to be related to Firefox Sync as whitelisted domains disappear after I have used another PC upon returning to my main machine.
It has been an excellent, if occasionally labour intensive, addition to my online security but as of writing it frustrates as much as it protects. - Se valoró con 3 de 5por Abass, hace 4 años
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por 森花, hace 4 años
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por semce2, hace 4 añosHad to stop using and switch to another script blocker due to it crashing on Fidelity Investments website.
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por XtremSpace, hace 5 años
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 16266848, hace 5 añosA good addon, but for some reason it decided to block the nvidia.com website for reasons unknown.. Had to reset the addon to get access back to the site so I could download graphics drivers..
Update: Recently I have been finding that when you diable this addon, and close Firefox, then start up Firefox this addon will be showing as active despite it being disabled.
It is becoming such a problem that I have had to remove the addon to be able to get my browser to behave. - Se valoró con 3 de 5por Join2, hace 5 añosLately when I look in the trusted list there are about 40 websites marked as trusted like: google-yahoo-hotmail etc...............I have not added these to the trusted list. So who put these websites in this list? Uninstall noscript and install again same problem. Cannot remove these sites, meaning I don't know how to. So untrusted by hand. What is this, some malware/adware?
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por assassini, hace 5 añospreviously remembered permissions. but now no longer . so frustrating to have to allow trusted sites every time
is this a known issue
will it be fixed in future update - Se valoró con 3 de 5por Dragganot33, hace 5 años
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Andralon, hace 5 añosa script that is marked "trusted" on one page, is also trusted on every other page, which is the same as "trusted globally".
if "disable restrictions globally (dangerous)" is
"dangerous" (in the programmers opinion), why is the "trusted" not bound to the specific page?
- page A does work without script X
- page B doesn't work without script X
(e.g. doubleclick, googleanalytics, googlestatics)
why would i want to allow script X on page A? - Se valoró con 3 de 5por davep, hace 5 añosFantastic in theory, and often in use, BUT one major issue for me. It takes time to allow each part of each site that you "trust". When your work requires you to interact with a lot of web sites, that adds up. All good, EXCEPT that on a regular basis, NoScript simply "loses" those entries. My sites stop working, and I have to go in a do it again for each. Remember too that it's not a matter of "trust this site", as a great many have good and bad mixed together. I personally go to at least dozens of sites that involve 5-15 different scripting sites, and have to sort out on each which are good and which are necessary to get the data I need. So it's a lot of work, but worth it, as long as my work isn't randomly discarded. Fix this, it's 5 stars. With the problem, it's closer to a "necessary evil".
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Rob , hace 5 añosAnother user (mdontu) just detailed the same problem I have.
Usually this extension is absolutely great. I've been using it for years. However, for quite some time it seems to struggle with resetting large whitelists when Firefox is sync'd over multiple computers. Gets really frustrating when you have to re-whitelist sites that you know you have already whitelisted.
The problem seems to be getting worse. I think the developer may be aware of it, but this really should get addressed.