Revisiones de Wikiwand - knowledge, with context
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context por Wikiwand
661 revisiones
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Niaz, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 12583252, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Rodion Borisov, hace 3 añosThis website is too green, and no proper source code addressed. What the hell is with this Wordpress-esque wannabe design? "Upgrade" button that was renamed to "Tell friends". Surely you jest!
Pinterest and few other monopoly buttons in 2022. You're serious? Everything screams Branding Bloat.
Very inconsistent main menu icons and colors. Readability factor is garbage. Incoherent usage of typography and HTML5. Incomplete dark theme.
Many people already told that Wikiwand doesn't respect privacy, and it's easily proven by uBlock Origin. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Eugenia, hace 3 añosI adore it, makes Wikipedia even more engaging and pleasant to read.
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Manmohan Singh Sajwan, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17333746, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 15497298, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 15088084, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Homayoon, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 16963261, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 16572602, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 16720396, hace 4 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Ander, hace 4 añosWhat a brilliant idea! It makes WP look like a hip magazine. It's much more pleasant and easier to use. I frequently edit WP, and wondered if it might interfere with that. But the Edit command is right there in one of the new menus, and editing session open in a new tab, in the original format. Nicely done! Thanks!
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por rob, hace 4 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 16631916, hace 4 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por all9n, hace 4 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Vedun, hace 4 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17018200, hace 4 añosUsed to be great. Now it is bloated, and confusing. Garbage AI feature, advertisement, overly complicated settings, missing language change... So many bad decisions. I chose a new addon for the old facelift I used to achieve with this addon.
I left the old review below:
Excellent addon. Makes Wikipedia look 21st Century web encyclopedia. - Se valoró con 3 de 5por Fatyanoor Ashfa, hace 4 añosI don't think this is for me - it's so unlike Wikipedia. I did start to appreciate it after trying it for some time (I especially like the nav bar on the left), but I also encountered quite a lot of issues, so I think I'll stick to regular Wikipedia in the meantime.
- Infoboxes look terrible. Images are off-center and the infobox is too close to the body of the article.
- Tables are sometimes split up when they have multiple headers.
- I also think content in tables needs more horizontal padding.
Dark mode certainly needs more work.
- Some elements still have a light background and the light text on it is difficult to see.
- Links in dark mode are gray, which is absurd.
- The text is a bit too bright for me. Either a lighter background or darker text would be easier on the eyes.
- Page previews disappear too slowly when my cursor moves away from it. Waiting for one to go away gets annoying when I'm trying to read the article content.
- The font looks horrid when both italicized and bold.
I understand that some of these issues might be caused by Wikipedia's own architecture, but I'm opting out regardless. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13641253, hace 4 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por choual, hace 4 añosCette extension n'améliore pas Wikipedia, elle vous redirige juste vers un autre site en s’appropriant le contenu de Wikipedia.. À fuir.
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13318527, hace 4 años