Revisiones de Wikiwand - knowledge, with context
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context por Wikiwand
Revisado por syrthio
Se valoró con 3 de 5
por syrthio, hace 2 añosit's... pretty to look at and read, but that's about it. I was excited to find this, but grew increasingly disappointed. most articles I personally read do not have images large enough attached to the article to not get extremely distorted by the otherwise-nice-looking banner Wikiwand generates, and customization is pretty basic (and no longer matches the screenshots here, unless I'm missing something). I was also not pleased with yet more shoving of AI down my throat. it took three or four times switching it off before it stopped popping up. the deal-breaker for me, though, is the loss of the hover preview for Wikilinks -- apparently, they're supposed to work, but never did for me and I get distracted enough as-is without having to open an entirely new page/tab just to see what the article is about. ultimately, user styles for vanilla Wikipedia serve my needs better.
662 revisiones
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Wamida, hace 2 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por carl, hace 2 días
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14503325, hace 3 días
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19040033, hace 5 díasUsed to be a great addon but now totally destroyed by the Ads and AI
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14706773, hace 6 días
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Ally Simy, hace 7 días
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19035698, hace 7 díasEnshittification everywhere. Was a very nice plugin to cleanly read wikipedia, now cluttered with AI and ads
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por LCM, hace 14 díasThey had the nerve to actually BLOCK people from accessing entire wikipedia pages. You are required to watch an ad before you can access the page. This is allegedly to have access to their "wikicontent," which is not needed or desired. This app used to be good. But pulling this crap was a step too far. You CANNOT BLOCK ACCESS TO WIKIPEDIA TO MAKE MONEY FROM ADS.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17979558, hace 20 días
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Milan Regec, hace 25 díasAll it does now is infest your Wikipedia with ads. Don't bother installing and I highly recommend uninstalling it if you already did so. Even when uninstalled, it keeps coming back and keeps stealing all Wikipedia links.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18996590, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Toccetness, hace un mesAd-required, AI-driven slop. Went from premiere readability to money-driven corporation. Do not install.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17669402, hace un mesAs many other reviews say. initially a good idea, now, full of AI slop i don't want.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por marii, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17852983, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 16307622, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Ok Google, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 12391569, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Wolphie, hace 2 mesesUsed to be a great extension/addon. Ruined by AI slop that apparently needs to appear everywhere now. Plus constant popups everywhere if cookies are cleared. Sad to see such a beautiful piece of work fall so low.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por winphreak, hace 3 mesesI can't wait until the AI screws up all the detailed trivia bits or simple math for a article summary.
Also if Wikiepedia is too hard to read for you, you should probably finish middle school.
This world is gonna get so dumb so fast I can't wait. - Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 12661639, hace 3 meses
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por ShodanV3, hace 3 mesesThey ruined the BEST wikipedia addon with AI. It's bloat now. If I wanted that, I'd just ask AI for info instead of using wikipedia. Please do a lite version without it or something.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17046154, hace 3 mesesUsed to be a solid add-on, but now pesters the user to login for "AI tools" every time a Wikipedia link is visited, causing unnecessary bloat and wasting the user's time. Why they absolutely ruined a good add-on is beyond me.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Lobélia H., hace 4 meses