Revisiones de NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite por Giorgio Maone
Revisado por Usuario de Firefox 12968835
Se valoró con 3 de 5
por Usuario de Firefox 12968835, hace 7 añosI previously said
"Sadly, I have to agree with some of the other reviews.....
The new version is quite simply, POO.
This is perfectly illustrated by the fact that I had to re-allow scripts that had been set as trusted just to post this sad reflection on what was, for the most part a highly useful and mature extension with a user interface that was relatively straight forward to interpret and use.
The new interface is Terrible to put it mildly. Its over 'simplification' and design has produced a bewildering experience that makes ones head ache in a state of near vertigo when first used. Just to add insult to injury, as previously stated, you will probably have repeat the process when the settings are forgotten.
No script has always been annoying when visiting a site for the first time. Identifying the minimum scripts allowed for site functionality whilst blocking the rest, was a tedious process but it was offset by the fact it only had to be done once. The result was a huge dividend of security, privacy, speed of page load, reduced memory usage and increased stability to the browser as a whole from avoiding execution of unnecessary and in many cases poorly written, bloated code.
In short the new NoScript is a horrible disappointment, in stark contrast to the wonderful browsing experience of Firefox 57"
At that time I felt the review was completely justified.
But, there is hope!
The UI is improving and in some ways, superior to the old which I think we all have to agree was a bit clumsy.
I understand now the 'forgetting' of settings directly attributable to the API changes in Quantum and Mozillas role in it and the unfair but understandable scorn from users like myself who have become accustomed to features being removed and UI changes from likes of Microsoft and others in the name of 'progress' and our willingness to unload both barrels as a result.
I persisted with noscript, temporally allowing just about everything, relying on Sandboxie protection.
It improves with every update to my everlasting gratitude and I cannot wait for the day I rate it 5 stars!
THANK YOU to the developer(s) for all of your hard work and persistence in the face of mounting criticism from people like myself.
No Script is in my opinion a vital extension for security, privacy, stability, user control and the enrichment of the browsing experience...
"Sadly, I have to agree with some of the other reviews.....
The new version is quite simply, POO.
This is perfectly illustrated by the fact that I had to re-allow scripts that had been set as trusted just to post this sad reflection on what was, for the most part a highly useful and mature extension with a user interface that was relatively straight forward to interpret and use.
The new interface is Terrible to put it mildly. Its over 'simplification' and design has produced a bewildering experience that makes ones head ache in a state of near vertigo when first used. Just to add insult to injury, as previously stated, you will probably have repeat the process when the settings are forgotten.
No script has always been annoying when visiting a site for the first time. Identifying the minimum scripts allowed for site functionality whilst blocking the rest, was a tedious process but it was offset by the fact it only had to be done once. The result was a huge dividend of security, privacy, speed of page load, reduced memory usage and increased stability to the browser as a whole from avoiding execution of unnecessary and in many cases poorly written, bloated code.
In short the new NoScript is a horrible disappointment, in stark contrast to the wonderful browsing experience of Firefox 57"
At that time I felt the review was completely justified.
But, there is hope!
The UI is improving and in some ways, superior to the old which I think we all have to agree was a bit clumsy.
I understand now the 'forgetting' of settings directly attributable to the API changes in Quantum and Mozillas role in it and the unfair but understandable scorn from users like myself who have become accustomed to features being removed and UI changes from likes of Microsoft and others in the name of 'progress' and our willingness to unload both barrels as a result.
I persisted with noscript, temporally allowing just about everything, relying on Sandboxie protection.
It improves with every update to my everlasting gratitude and I cannot wait for the day I rate it 5 stars!
THANK YOU to the developer(s) for all of your hard work and persistence in the face of mounting criticism from people like myself.
No Script is in my opinion a vital extension for security, privacy, stability, user control and the enrichment of the browsing experience...
2.372 revisiones
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por cwqing1973, hace un día
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14468519, hace 3 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por rabbitshee, hace 4 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19047433, hace 7 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por A. Bilmanda, hace 9 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Lazer Bear, hace 9 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Sembler, hace 18 días
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 15056996, hace un mesissues with outdoorline.sk ; I have to stop Noscrypt to proceed with Payment gateway GP webpay
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por 镂心鉥肝, hace un mesNoScript还是很好的,不管是界面还是解释如何使用都进行了改进。不过,文章内容应该更加简洁一点。告诉用户每一个功能开关的意思。同时NoScript默认会阻止扩展脚本
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17847461, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18989716, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Max, hace un mesI really wanted to use NoScript. I prefer single-purpose extensions that focus on doing one job well, compared to more multi-purpose extensions like uBlock Origin.
However, I ultimately couldn't stick with it because the user experience did not suit my needs.
E.g. one mobile screen presents around 12 different icons packed into the height of 3 lines of text, leaving a large portion of the screen completely empty below them.
My main frustration is that none of these icons have labels. Expecting users to learn and memorize the meaning of a dozen different unlabeled symbols creates an unnecessary barrier to entry and makes using the extension quickly and efficiently very difficult. It feels counter-intuitive to leave so much screen real estate blank when that space could be used to label each icon and explain its function.
uBlock Origin is easier to use than NoScript. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por LittleFire, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Absinthe, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por thofree, hace 2 mesesGets detected by Youtube's anti ad-block stuff. Wish you had a button to turn it off easily for a website without disabling it entirely.
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18920843, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18315395, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por VonD68, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por luis, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Retromania, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Luciano Rangel, hace 2 meses