Revisiones de FireMonkey
FireMonkey por erosman
Revisado por Usuario de Firefox 13707739
Se valoró con 5 de 5
por Usuario de Firefox 13707739, hace 6 añosAt GitHub I already expressed my gratitude to the Dev @erosman, so my review below is for potential new FireMonkey' users.
It is an add-on for smart users!
FireMonkey easily replaces several other add-ons, using just 20% of the resources (RAM, CPU etc). The improvements in browser performance, security and privacy are visible.
In addition, FireMonkey is the only add-on (in its class) really Open Source, with the express commitment of the Dev not to invade privacy.
Another advantage is that FireMonkey uses the latest newest API.
Those users who don't care about performance, security, privacy, etc., and want lights, garlands, colors, glitter and fancy stuff ... FireMonkey may not be for them.
Some of the other similar add-ons have many automated functions, while in FireMonkey some are manual. At first I felt intimidated. But in less than 2 days of use, without problems I got used to everything. Today with few days of use, it seems like I have FireMonkey for years. I had practically no problems in the transition and migration of all my other add-ons/scripts (CSS & JS).
FireMonkey is a minimalist add-on, but totally powerful. Virtually any difficulty in the transition of other add-ons can be solved in FireMonkey (or at least almost solved). By the way, every excellent add-on requires a small investment of time at the beginning. But it's just a one-time-task/job.
The Dev (@erosman) is very responsive, and replies very promptly at GitHub. The few problems I found, the Dev solved them on the same day.
FireMonkey is not perfect, and it will undoubtedly have a path of evolution. But today, I can't imagine going back to use all the add-ons FireMonkey replaced.
Do you have doubts? Fears? Take a simple test!... it'll be difficult to repent.
Here I am giving 5 stars because it is the maximum, but FireMonkey deserves all the possible stars.
Attached a review from GHacks: https://www.ghacks.net/2019/09/10/firemonkey-uses-firefoxs-official-api-for-userscripts-and-userstyles/
It is an add-on for smart users!
FireMonkey easily replaces several other add-ons, using just 20% of the resources (RAM, CPU etc). The improvements in browser performance, security and privacy are visible.
In addition, FireMonkey is the only add-on (in its class) really Open Source, with the express commitment of the Dev not to invade privacy.
Another advantage is that FireMonkey uses the latest newest API.
Those users who don't care about performance, security, privacy, etc., and want lights, garlands, colors, glitter and fancy stuff ... FireMonkey may not be for them.
Some of the other similar add-ons have many automated functions, while in FireMonkey some are manual. At first I felt intimidated. But in less than 2 days of use, without problems I got used to everything. Today with few days of use, it seems like I have FireMonkey for years. I had practically no problems in the transition and migration of all my other add-ons/scripts (CSS & JS).
FireMonkey is a minimalist add-on, but totally powerful. Virtually any difficulty in the transition of other add-ons can be solved in FireMonkey (or at least almost solved). By the way, every excellent add-on requires a small investment of time at the beginning. But it's just a one-time-task/job.
The Dev (@erosman) is very responsive, and replies very promptly at GitHub. The few problems I found, the Dev solved them on the same day.
FireMonkey is not perfect, and it will undoubtedly have a path of evolution. But today, I can't imagine going back to use all the add-ons FireMonkey replaced.
Do you have doubts? Fears? Take a simple test!... it'll be difficult to repent.
Here I am giving 5 stars because it is the maximum, but FireMonkey deserves all the possible stars.
Attached a review from GHacks: https://www.ghacks.net/2019/09/10/firemonkey-uses-firefoxs-official-api-for-userscripts-and-userstyles/
81 revisiones
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Alexander A., hace un mesIs it possible, by any chance, at some point, to get something like uBlock's procedural cosmetic filters for our UserCSS scripts? CSS is great, but it's a bit lacking in functionality, especially in regex support.
I'm only starting to learn JS, and I imagine it's gonna take a while before I'll be able to write the scripts I need.
Thanks for all your hard work! - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Alex Alex, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13626153, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Crend King, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Adán, hace 4 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por ecompton59, hace 5 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por jackyzy823, hace 6 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Grano, hace 7 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Dodge1, hace un año
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por royalsos, hace un año
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Lex, hace un año
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18434741, hace un añoNothing works properly both user-Scripts and user-Style are broken especially any .css seems to not being respected
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace un añoPlease post the details to the support for a proper investigation. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por tuure, hace un año
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por garrettw87, hace un añoI wanted to like FireMonkey, but unfortunately it seems to be incompatible with the vast majority of scripts I use with the Waze Map Editor downloaded from greasyfork.org. There are no JavaScript errors -- the scripts just do nothing. They are listed as active on the page, but something about them just doesn't work with this addon. So I'll have to switch to a different one.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace un añoPlease post the details to the support for a proper investigation. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Brown121, hace 2 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14571563, hace 2 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Đăng Tú, hace 2 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por DavidK2, hace 2 añosThe UI is much better and more intuitive than that of TemperMonkey.
I really like the distinction between CSS and JS modifications and that I don’t need to use “proprietary” GreaseMonkey functions like GM_addStyle (` /* the CSS goes here */ `).
FireMonkey also doesn’t exhibit the bug that TemperMonkey does — when I navigated the same portal over many pages, it seemed TM kept adding the same CSS script over and over, which, over time, slowed Firefox noticeably (after a while TM reported aplying about 70 scripts instead of 2!). - Se valoró con 5 de 5por ImQP, hace 2 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Frantishek, hace 2 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Ben SALT.id, hace 2 años
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 12818352, hace 2 añosSeems like we can't import scripts from zip
Right, unzip everything and import works, but slightly inconvenient, thank you for replying.Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 añosUsers can unzip themselves and then mass-import all scripts. Reading zip requires additional library. - Se valoró con 2 de 5por Freso, hace 2 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por idealth, hace 2 años