Revisiones de NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite por Giorgio Maone
Revisado por Usuario de Firefox 12968835
Se valoró con 3 de 5
por Usuario de Firefox 12968835, hace 8 añosI previously said
"Sadly, I have to agree with some of the other reviews.....
The new version is quite simply, POO.
This is perfectly illustrated by the fact that I had to re-allow scripts that had been set as trusted just to post this sad reflection on what was, for the most part a highly useful and mature extension with a user interface that was relatively straight forward to interpret and use.
The new interface is Terrible to put it mildly. Its over 'simplification' and design has produced a bewildering experience that makes ones head ache in a state of near vertigo when first used. Just to add insult to injury, as previously stated, you will probably have repeat the process when the settings are forgotten.
No script has always been annoying when visiting a site for the first time. Identifying the minimum scripts allowed for site functionality whilst blocking the rest, was a tedious process but it was offset by the fact it only had to be done once. The result was a huge dividend of security, privacy, speed of page load, reduced memory usage and increased stability to the browser as a whole from avoiding execution of unnecessary and in many cases poorly written, bloated code.
In short the new NoScript is a horrible disappointment, in stark contrast to the wonderful browsing experience of Firefox 57"
At that time I felt the review was completely justified.
But, there is hope!
The UI is improving and in some ways, superior to the old which I think we all have to agree was a bit clumsy.
I understand now the 'forgetting' of settings directly attributable to the API changes in Quantum and Mozillas role in it and the unfair but understandable scorn from users like myself who have become accustomed to features being removed and UI changes from likes of Microsoft and others in the name of 'progress' and our willingness to unload both barrels as a result.
I persisted with noscript, temporally allowing just about everything, relying on Sandboxie protection.
It improves with every update to my everlasting gratitude and I cannot wait for the day I rate it 5 stars!
THANK YOU to the developer(s) for all of your hard work and persistence in the face of mounting criticism from people like myself.
No Script is in my opinion a vital extension for security, privacy, stability, user control and the enrichment of the browsing experience...
"Sadly, I have to agree with some of the other reviews.....
The new version is quite simply, POO.
This is perfectly illustrated by the fact that I had to re-allow scripts that had been set as trusted just to post this sad reflection on what was, for the most part a highly useful and mature extension with a user interface that was relatively straight forward to interpret and use.
The new interface is Terrible to put it mildly. Its over 'simplification' and design has produced a bewildering experience that makes ones head ache in a state of near vertigo when first used. Just to add insult to injury, as previously stated, you will probably have repeat the process when the settings are forgotten.
No script has always been annoying when visiting a site for the first time. Identifying the minimum scripts allowed for site functionality whilst blocking the rest, was a tedious process but it was offset by the fact it only had to be done once. The result was a huge dividend of security, privacy, speed of page load, reduced memory usage and increased stability to the browser as a whole from avoiding execution of unnecessary and in many cases poorly written, bloated code.
In short the new NoScript is a horrible disappointment, in stark contrast to the wonderful browsing experience of Firefox 57"
At that time I felt the review was completely justified.
But, there is hope!
The UI is improving and in some ways, superior to the old which I think we all have to agree was a bit clumsy.
I understand now the 'forgetting' of settings directly attributable to the API changes in Quantum and Mozillas role in it and the unfair but understandable scorn from users like myself who have become accustomed to features being removed and UI changes from likes of Microsoft and others in the name of 'progress' and our willingness to unload both barrels as a result.
I persisted with noscript, temporally allowing just about everything, relying on Sandboxie protection.
It improves with every update to my everlasting gratitude and I cannot wait for the day I rate it 5 stars!
THANK YOU to the developer(s) for all of your hard work and persistence in the face of mounting criticism from people like myself.
No Script is in my opinion a vital extension for security, privacy, stability, user control and the enrichment of the browsing experience...
2.387 revisiones
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Air, hace 9 díasVery useful on a computer, however, enabling it by default on a mobile phone will block many important features, including but not limited to any AI features and video browsing
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19157064, hace 16 díasCompletely breaks reddit on mobile, site becomes unusable. I only got it for help blocking reddits creepy tracking bs on this browser.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Cory Sanin, hace 16 díasOne star for SidebarUtil.tab.js
Disruptive as hell and for what? Why do you need to know if I have a sidebar open? I don't even know what a sidebar is. Remove this nonsense. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19145735, hace 18 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por And?, hace 22 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por A Tea Daze, hace 22 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por srzlt, hace 25 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por jordan9543, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por vit55555, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18218075, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por fiendkaka, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Shannon Sobeck, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Flyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19088604, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por kk, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19072892, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por cwqing1973, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14468519, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por rabbitshee, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19047433, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por A. Bilmanda, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Lazer Bear, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Sembler, hace 2 meses