Reviews for Save Page WE
Save Page WE by DW-dev
Review by avalon
Rated 1 out of 5
by avalon, 5 years agoSorry, but this add-on is absolutely terrible...:
1. You have to download every web page TWICE to save it with Save Page WE. Why in the world should i download again the file that has already been fully loaded in a browser??? Mozilla Archive Format didn't have such an inadequate behavior.
2. Don't work without internet (even when you already have a fully loaded web page): If you are trying to save a web page without internet connection you will just save a plain HTML file without pictures etc. Mozilla Archive Format add-on didn't have this problem as well.
3. Many unsaved items or VERY LONG saving time and VERY BIG file size:
Mozilla Archive Format 6 sec. 1,2 MB. Almost all items are saved.
Save Page WE (Slow Resources 10) 12—13 sec. 2 MB. Many unsaved items.
Save Page WE (Slow Resources 1000) 93 sec (!!!). 30 MB (!!!). Almost all items are saved.
4. You can't save a web page before it's fully loaded in a browser. Mozilla Archive Format add-on didn't have this problem as well.
5. No option to save only selected parts of a web page. UNMHT add-on didn't have problems with that.
6. Sortable tables becomes nonsortable. Mozilla Archive Format have this problem as well.
1. You have to download every web page TWICE to save it with Save Page WE. Why in the world should i download again the file that has already been fully loaded in a browser??? Mozilla Archive Format didn't have such an inadequate behavior.
2. Don't work without internet (even when you already have a fully loaded web page): If you are trying to save a web page without internet connection you will just save a plain HTML file without pictures etc. Mozilla Archive Format add-on didn't have this problem as well.
3. Many unsaved items or VERY LONG saving time and VERY BIG file size:
Mozilla Archive Format 6 sec. 1,2 MB. Almost all items are saved.
Save Page WE (Slow Resources 10) 12—13 sec. 2 MB. Many unsaved items.
Save Page WE (Slow Resources 1000) 93 sec (!!!). 30 MB (!!!). Almost all items are saved.
4. You can't save a web page before it's fully loaded in a browser. Mozilla Archive Format add-on didn't have this problem as well.
5. No option to save only selected parts of a web page. UNMHT add-on didn't have problems with that.
6. Sortable tables becomes nonsortable. Mozilla Archive Format have this problem as well.
Developer response
posted 5 years agoMozilla Archive Format (MAF) and UnMHT don't work with Firefox after Version 56 or with other browsers. Legacy extensions, such as MAF and UnMHT, were able to access internal functionality within Firefox to support their operations. This is not possible for new extensions that have to use the new WebExtensions API's. Also, new extensions cannot access all of the resources that were loaded when the page was loaded by the browser, so these resources have to be reloaded.
447 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 16745788, 2 months agoБольшое спасибо! Пользуюсь редко, но выручает именно она
- Rated 5 out of 5by Pavel, 3 months agoDear Developer,
I’m writing to provide feedback on Save Page WE. I’ve noticed that the extension saves the web page exactly as it is rendered at the moment of saving. As a result, any content hidden behind spoilers (which remain collapsed) is not included in the saved file. This has been somewhat inconvenient, as I often need to preserve the entire content of a page.
Would it be possible to add an option in the extension’s settings to automatically expand spoiler sections (or other similar hidden elements) before saving the page? This feature would greatly enhance the usefulness of Save Page WE for users who regularly work with pages containing expandable content.
Thank you for your hard work on this excellent tool, and I look forward to any improvements you might consider.
Best regards,
Pavel - Rated 5 out of 5by Nikitamce, 4 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18582702, 4 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13462872, 5 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Zing, 5 months agoAs a regular user of Save Page WE, I appreciate its ability to save entire web pages as single HTML files, making subsequent editing straightforward. This functionality surpasses Firefox's standard save feature, offering more accurate archiving and easier modification of saved pages.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Radioamatoro, 6 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18709981, 6 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14295457, 6 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Víctor A. Rodríguez (Bit-Man), 7 months agoGreat tool!
One single problem I have is not allowing to download www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js but entering it in my browser can be shown and downloaded - Rated 4 out of 5by AnneF, 8 months agoI used to love and depend on this extension. I switched to Firefox ESR and now I can't get the icon to display on the toolbar when I install the extension.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13545908, 8 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Bellykid, 8 months agoIt doesn't let you do anything on the page. It's just a image.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Noel Miles, 8 months agoNo doubt, the best offline page saver. Saved my fandom guide without effort and access it smootly without destroying the web. Thumbs up!
- Rated 5 out of 5by 雲霖, 8 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18594010, 9 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Arthur, 9 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by eggv83, 9 months agoThis was a huge help in saving some service manuals from my auto manufacturer that stopped offering PDF versions of their documents and because "normal saving" of the HTML through the web browser didn't preserve the page formatting, hyperlinks (within the same webpage), and images. I had a couple errors or incomplete saves at first, but the add-on configuration tip that popped up resolved them.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Alfred, 10 months ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by andreasdo, 10 months agoGreat tool to one click save a whole page, but I miss a different autosave directory in the settings.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14060941, a year ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 13560193, a year ago