Reviews for GNOME Shell integration
GNOME Shell integration by Yuri Konotopov
Review by Firefox user 13106008
Rated 3 out of 5
by Firefox user 13106008, 8 years agoGreat concept and have previously had high success. Though recently my FF has been performing like crap and today finally set out to isolate it. High CPU usage even when idle one tab open to duckduckgo. Running Ubuntu 16.04 FF latest.
First part (which I fixed)
---------------------------------------------
First problem:
-> high CPU consumed by Firefox idle. Isolated down to this plugin. (plugin enabled = 20% CPU, plugin disabled = 0-1% CPU idle)
Seems I was running an older version of the backend service, which was the root cause of this issue. (sorry didn't note which chrome-gnome-shell version was running previously).
Second issue. (no fix)
---------------------------------------------
Any attempt to close firefox (File Quit, CTRL+Q, restart FF due to addon/extension change, etc.) results in a hang and crash. Firefox spins CPU for about 1 minute then crashes.
Technical Details
----
$ dpkg --list | egrep "chrome-gnome-shell|firefox"
ii chrome-gnome-shell 9-0ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.3 all GNOME Shell extensions integration for web browsers
ii firefox 53.0.3+build1-0ubuntu0.16.04.2 amd64 Safe and easy web browser from Mozilla
4.4.0-79-generic Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS
First part (which I fixed)
---------------------------------------------
First problem:
-> high CPU consumed by Firefox idle. Isolated down to this plugin. (plugin enabled = 20% CPU, plugin disabled = 0-1% CPU idle)
Seems I was running an older version of the backend service, which was the root cause of this issue. (sorry didn't note which chrome-gnome-shell version was running previously).
Second issue. (no fix)
---------------------------------------------
Any attempt to close firefox (File Quit, CTRL+Q, restart FF due to addon/extension change, etc.) results in a hang and crash. Firefox spins CPU for about 1 minute then crashes.
Technical Details
----
$ dpkg --list | egrep "chrome-gnome-shell|firefox"
ii chrome-gnome-shell 9-0ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.3 all GNOME Shell extensions integration for web browsers
ii firefox 53.0.3+build1-0ubuntu0.16.04.2 amd64 Safe and easy web browser from Mozilla
4.4.0-79-generic Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS
Developer response
posted 8 years agoHello.
It is a Firefox bug 1349874 [1] and explained in the wiki [2]. Please ask Mozilla to fix it.
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1349874
[2] https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GnomeShellIntegrationForChrome/Installation#Troubleshooting
It is a Firefox bug 1349874 [1] and explained in the wiki [2]. Please ask Mozilla to fix it.
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1349874
[2] https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GnomeShellIntegrationForChrome/Installation#Troubleshooting
263 reviews
- Rated 3 out of 5by Firefox user 18960744, a month ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 18426124, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by me18, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by kdkkd, 3 months ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by sayimburak, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13143822, 4 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18769754, 5 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Behrad, 5 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by grisfer, 7 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by sesshomaru1234, 7 months ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 18606553, 8 months ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by MalariaViruZ, a year agoFunktioniert normalerweise sehr gut, aber momentan gibt es ein Problem mit Firefox-Version in Debian 12.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Dheeraj, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Fr, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by davidcpitts, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Antonio Pires, a year ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 18191032, a year ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 12360209, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Cirnos, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18051174, 2 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Scotty_Trees, 2 years agoIt does the thing it's supposed to do. Still Extension Manager (flatpak) is the best way to get extensions. No clue if this add-on will see future updates or no?
- Rated 5 out of 5by sb, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 16412440, 2 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Leo, 2 years ago