Bewertungen für SingleFile
SingleFile von gildas
Bewertungen von Firefox-Benutzer 15950945
Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternen
von Firefox-Benutzer 15950945, vor 5 JahrenGood idea in general but it seems to have problems with pictures, just an example
https://www.rotan2.pt/
Only the big picture at the top is visible after saving the page (and the text columns are changing from right to left and back again after the positions where the pictures are at the original page), no other pctures are shown, I checked ticking and unticking the picture options "Saving delayed pctures..." (not sure about "delayed", here in German "zurückgestellte Bilder") but this does not make any difference
UnMHT on Firefox 56 saves the page with all the pictures and I see it exactly as on my screen before saving it including the text columns at the right positions, too. (page saved with SingleFile is about 67 mb without pictures, page saved with UnMHT is about 44 mb and has all the pictures)
Edit: It was not meant as a bug report.
Website see above saved with SavePage WE (never used so far) is much smaller than the one saved with SingleFile but otherwise exactly looks the same that is without the pictures etc. No idea why, not comfortable of course, seems that the mht format was the much better option for me at least
https://www.rotan2.pt/
Only the big picture at the top is visible after saving the page (and the text columns are changing from right to left and back again after the positions where the pictures are at the original page), no other pctures are shown, I checked ticking and unticking the picture options "Saving delayed pctures..." (not sure about "delayed", here in German "zurückgestellte Bilder") but this does not make any difference
UnMHT on Firefox 56 saves the page with all the pictures and I see it exactly as on my screen before saving it including the text columns at the right positions, too. (page saved with SingleFile is about 67 mb without pictures, page saved with UnMHT is about 44 mb and has all the pictures)
Edit: It was not meant as a bug report.
Website see above saved with SavePage WE (never used so far) is much smaller than the one saved with SingleFile but otherwise exactly looks the same that is without the pictures etc. No idea why, not comfortable of course, seems that the mht format was the much better option for me at least
954 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19016964, vor 3 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Toukon, vor 9 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon ali, vor 11 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon tuxmux, vor 11 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18680106, vor 19 TagenWorks exactly as advertised, finally pressing Ctrl+S actually does what it's supposed to instead of making a broken document.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Soren, vor 22 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon LCharlles, vor 24 TagenThis can deal with many pages that are not correctly saved in default setting of firefox
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18978921, vor 25 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon addonexplorer, vor 25 TagenExcellent archival tool! These days you cannot trust that any page will be available or drastically modified in the future.
SingleFile grabs everything or just parts, incredibly usefu and I use this along with Obsidian webclipper + Obsidian. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18977738, vor 25 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Goston, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon OverLordGoldDragon, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18702861, vor 2 MonatenI rarely give reviews but this one I must. It worked out of box. Can do things even FireShot can't such as saving the page or portion of it in a single html file! Very useful for saving a website or web page on Internet Archive.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon stackingcows, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18935224, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18921230, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Lurker, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Chiral, vor 2 MonatenОчень полезное расширение и отзывчивый разработчик. А то стандартный инструментарий сохранения страниц уже давно нормально не работает с современным вебом и блокировщиками рекламы. Особенно полезное приложение в условиях, когда всякие уважаемые органы то и дело стремятся модерировать интернет, защищая граждан от информации, например, по починке устаревших серверов (не пытайтесь понять эту серию эвфемизмов на иностранном языке, это бессмысленно :) )
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon BatsRule, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon NRR, vor 2 MonatenОчень классное расширения для создания слепков веб страниц!